This is a report of the second battle of the American Civil War campaign that Professor Gary Sheffield and I are fighting.
Report to the Confederate C-in-C from the commander of Confederate States' forces in Akragas City, South Carolina
Dear General,
I am writing this shortly after nightfall on what has been a most sanguinary day. We retain possession of Akragas City, but the enemy are inside our fortifications to the west and north and are blocking the road leading east. In short we are surrounded and have taken heavy casualties. Indeed, it was only the coming of night at turn 15 that saved the army from exhaustion – we were but one point away. The enemies's losses too have been heavy. but not, I fear, as heavy as ours.
Before the battle commenced, we had built the fortifications on three sides, the fourth of course being the seawards flank. I deployed my cavalry brigade to screen the eastern flank, from once I judged the most serious threats to come, viz along the coastal road. The Yankee Southern Brigade did indeed materialise on that very highway. I dismounted my cavalry, and this force of noble equestrians, and my elite 1st Brigade, handily held that position for the duration of the fracas; on no occasion did an enemy succeed in putting his long Yankee nose inside the eastern fortifications, although late in the day an enemy unit established itself in the woods through the immediate north and was able to bring some firepower to bear, with indifferent success.
Alack and alas, it was a different story in the centre and west of our position. The enemy's Central Brigade, supported by remains of his Cavalry Brigade, which was noticeably under strength and, perhaps as a consequence, played very little part in the battle, launched a fierce attack from the north. Enemy fire power drove back one of our gallant units and consequently the enemy in the form of one of the Zouave regiments was able to gain ingress to our fortifications. Sadly, one of my subordinate commanders, a most gallant fellow but lacking in tactical knowhow, failed to appreciate the importance of the hill just beyond the north eastern section of our fortifications. Our enemy, with the typical low cunning for which the Yankee is notorious, seized that very feature and was able to bring significant musketry to bear on the gallant defenders. Suffice it to say that eventually most of the northern and eastern fortifications, and of course their hinterland, were by moonrise in the hands of the enemy. As an honourable Southern gentlemen, my honesty compels me to admit that had the daylight continued but another hour, we should have been comprehensively defeated.
So now, General, I am on the horns of a dilemma, and the instructions that I crave you to render unto me, will be my only way of removing myself from this discomfiture. Pray informed me, can a relief force arrive within 24 at the most 36 hours? If so, I will cling on and await the second round of this battle. If however, the answer is nay, the choice is indeed bleak.
I could attempt to break out to the east or north, and move into enemy-held territory. This has the advantage of probably achieving surprise, but local intelligence informs us there is a sizeable enemy force advancing towards us and so seems to be very risky course of action.
I could attempt to break out to the west, but as this is an obvious move and I would be significantly outnumbered it would be a desperate measure indeed.
I could ask the enemy for his peace terms. He actually offered me honourable terms on Turn 13, proposing that my force would be allowed to withdraw unmolested with our weapons and equipment along the road to the west. At the time I considered that even terms such as these to be beneath my dignity. In retrospect perhaps I was too hasty. I sincerely doubt that anything as generous will be offered now; I am compelled to believe that the only proposal will be offered will be that of surrendering my force.
General, I beseech you let me know your mind on this matter, at the first available opportunity.
I remain, your obedient servant,
Commander of Confederate States' forces in Akragas City, South Carolina
The situation leading to the Battle of Akragas City.
So, it looks as if the Confederate forced will be forced to withdraw from its prepared positions, and the Union troops seem to have achieved a notable victory.
Since this report was received by the Confederate commander-in-chief on Sicily, the following was message has been received:
Sir, one of our patriotic civilians in Akragas City obtained an order from the Yankee Commander, which is here attached. It is stomach churning in its boastfulness.
Order of the day from General Jolyon Custard, commander of United States Army forces in Akragas City.
Well boys, you sure whupped them Rebs. We have them pinned into this Sesesh dung heap like a rattlesnake in a trash can - and just like them rattlers, these Rebs can be mighty dangerous when cornered. So y'all keep your eyes peeled and your wits about you. But otherwise spend tomorrow getting yourself back into fine fettle, cos cause sure as eggs is eggs, there's more a fighting coming down the Turnpike.
In the meantime, you fellas in the artillery can bombard those southern rapscallions in that there town - hopefully that will make them see sense, and come out with their hands up, or else they have the cheery prospect of eating rats when they run out of food. We kin just wait it out, as our force grows bigger over the next few days as our reinforcements arrive, at the same time as those Rebels get more difficult to see sideways on.
I have ordered the sending of a telegram to Mr Lincoln in Washington to tell him that glad news. Old Abe will, I'm sure, the gratified by our victory.
Some photographs of the Battle of Akragas City.
Please note that the photographs featured above are © Professor Gary Sheffield.

This is a very interesting campaign, and enjoyable battle report. Nice photos too. It looks like the Yanks have the upper hand in this campaign now.
ReplyDeleteRoger,
DeleteI must admit that I didn’t expect to see my forces beaten … but they were! They fell into the Union trap, and paid the price.
I’ve ordered the survivors to breakout to the west … but I expect that many of them will be forced to surrender.
All the best,
Bob
Bob -
ReplyDeleteFort Donelson all over again.... I daresay no breakout is feasible...?
Commiseration,
Maj-Genl Scraxton Scragg...
Archduke Piccolo,
DeleteI still cannot fully comprehend how a force in prepared positions was beaten so thoroughly … but they were!
As I understand it, the Union commander pinned my best troops with a feigned attack whilst attacking another sector of the defences with a combined force of infantry and dismounted cavalry. The Confederate artillery did not occupy a crucial hill, and the Union was able to put their own artillery there and fire down onto the positions occupied by my troops. The result was a rout … and I’ll be lucky if any of the troops I sent into battle will be able to break out. Several regiments were destroyed and the rest are seriously weakened. All I can hope is that the z union troops didn’t get away unscathed.
All the best,
Bob
Bob, nearly right! Actually I put infantry on the undefended hill not artillery, which was further back. The main attack, the one which I was initially very dubious about, was the frontal assault from the north, and I moved my horsed cavalry to the west to cut the CSA line of retreat. The turning point was when I won a close combat at the fortifications and the Reb commander chose to retreat rather than take the hit. They allowed me to get the unit through the fortifications, and that eventually delivered victory.
DeleteGary S,
DeleteThanks for the corrections. It sounds as if the CSA commander chose the wrong option and decided to retain a unit’s strength rather than its position in the defences. It’s one of the crucial decisions that the PW rules force on a player.
All the best,
Bob
Yes, that's one of the strengths of the rules. To be fair to my opponent, he gave me bit of a thumping in the last game before skilfully withdrawing his army to a very strong position.
DeleteGary S,
DeleteThere are some wargamers who hate the mechanism … and have told me so. Interestingly, none of them ever appeared to have used the PW rules; they’d just read or heard about it!
All the best,
Bob
Bob and Gary -
DeleteThe retreat or take the hit is a feature I have liked from the beginning of my experience with PW - as I discovered in even my earliest 'Portable' battles. Generally speaking, the attacker would be willing to take a few hits in order to keep up the pressure; the defender is more likely to want to retreat. But in defence of a strong place - one that might be crucial to the whole position, the thing becomes a judgement call. That's the sort of thing one wants in a war game - solo or otherwise.
Just by the way, I am unsure whether the PW rule sets combats between adversaries in contact are automatic competitive (both sides roll in either 'turn') and require no activation, but that is the way i've played them in most of the sets. Combined with the 'retreat or die' rule, they make holding attacks not merely feasible, but practical.
Of course, a 4SP unit down to 2 or fewer SPs is more likely to want to take the hit. But that's the idea - absorb some of the incoming, use the time to bring up the reserves (still using the PW 'activation' system), and rotate or throw in the decisive strike.
This method ameliorates the piecemeal tendency of the activation system. The activation system goes to bringing in a chance element to solo games; the 'holding attacks' give an attacking army to deliver powerful assaults.
Cheers,
Ion
Archduke Piccolo (Ion),
DeleteYou've summed up the intention behind the retreat or hit rule better than I could have done ... and why it makes the rules that little more interesting to use than the usual run-of-the-mill ones.
I'd never thought about the interaction of that rule mechanism with the activation rules ... but you're right!
All the best,
Bob
A very enjoyable read. I like the letter style of the report. Nice pictures of the game as well. As always, looking forward to more campaign reports.
ReplyDeleteI'm glad you liked my reports! I indulged myself there.
DeleteWEK 3,
DeleteCheers! I also like the epistolary style of report. It reads so much more interestingly than a simple ‘X did this, and then Y did this’ battle commentary.
All the best,
Bob
Gary S,
DeleteI loved your report!
All the best,
Bob
A very entertaining campaign thus far. Also a fine example of how a well thought out plan is sometimes not enough if the execution by subordinate officers is imperfect.
ReplyDeleteMark Cordone,
DeleteCheers! I hoped to lure the Union troops into a trap … and fell into their’s! I’m going to need a lot of luck to extricate what remains of my troops from the battlefield.
All the best,
Bob
There were very few close combats in this battle. Instead both sides preferred close range firefights, which seems to reflect ACW tactics well.
ReplyDeleteGary S,
DeleteThis is something I hope to encourage in my forthcoming Portable Belle Époque Wargame rules.
All the best,
Bob
A fantastic report from Gary S - very entertaining read.
ReplyDeleteMaudlin Jack Tar,
DeleteI totally agree! It's an excellent battle report.
All the best,
Bob
Hi Bob,
ReplyDeleteWhat a cracking battle report! The epistolary format from both commanders was a joy to read—General Custard’s Order of the Day had me chuckling.
Fascinating discussion on the Portable Wargame mechanics in the comments as well. The retreat-vs-hit decision really drives home how critical every tactical choice is when holding a defensive line. Best of luck extricating the survivors in the breakout!
All the best, Andy
Andrew Bruce (Andy),
DeleteI totally agree about Gary's battle report. Mind you, it helps that he is a professor of military history and has probably read dozens of real despatches from generals.
The PW rules have been described by some people as being very simple ... but the reality is that the way the simple mechanisms interact and inter-relate produces what I think of as subtle and sophisticated results. I think that's why they have been so popular and have proven to be so adaptable.
All the best,
Bob