tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6933470253715910366.post6584715466908814351..comments2024-03-28T19:58:17.811+00:00Comments on Wargaming Miscellany: 4-3-2 becomes 3-2-1Robert (Bob) Corderyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13109130990434792266noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6933470253715910366.post-5092284393402606842014-12-10T18:28:56.906+00:002014-12-10T18:28:56.906+00:00Ross Mac,
I have been playing around with these I...Ross Mac,<br /><br />I have been playing around with these Infantry/Cavalry/Artillery ratios for some time, and keep coming back to the 4-3-2 ratio. In fact I have wondered if the Artillery should be beefed up a bit to make the ratios 4-3-3 ... which would enable me to have two crew figures on each base.<br /><br />I have a Napoleonic version of the rules in mind ... and I am looking at two-figure bases, with 4 Infantry/3 Cavalry/1Artillery bases per unit because I think that it will look better.<br /><br />All the best,<br /><br />BobRobert (Bob) Corderyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13109130990434792266noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6933470253715910366.post-44430903154723492642014-12-10T17:31:50.335+00:002014-12-10T17:31:50.335+00:00I've actually been going the other way and con...I've actually been going the other way and contemplating adding figures without changing how many 'hits' a unit could take. This is a reflection of 2 factors, 1 is the look of the units, the other is that I would like an excuse to use more of my toy! <br /><br />However, the work involved for no change in how the game plays has convinced to continue 'steady as she goes' Ross Mac rmacfa@gmail.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04053555991679802013noreply@blogger.com