Pages

Sunday, 29 September 2019

Japanese-built Coastal Defence Ships/Cruisers

Many people do not realise that during the period before the outbreak of the Second World War, the Japanese built warships for other nations. Amongst these were two pairs of coastal defence ships/cruisers, one pair for the Chinese Navy and the other for the Royal Thai Navy.

The two Chinese ships (the Ning Hai-class cruisers) were small, compact light cruisers that suffered from high centres of gravity, which made the ships unstable in heavy seas. They were also powered by obsolescent triple-expansion steam engines, which meant that their top speed was less than 25 knots ... far lower than that of contemporary light cruisers.


The two ships were slightly different when completed, and their characteristics were:
  • Displacement: 2,486 tons
  • Dimensions:
    • Length: 360ft (109.7m)
    • Beam: 39ft (11.9m)
    • Draught: 13ft (4.0m)
  • Propulsion: 4 mixed coal/oil-fired boilers; three triple-expansion reciprocating steam engines each driving a propeller
  • Speed: 21 to 23 knots
  • Range: 5,000 nautical miles
  • Complement: 361
  • Armament:
    • Both ships: 6 × 5.5" (140mm) 3rd Year Type guns (3 x 2); 4 × 21" (533mm) torpedo tubes (2 x 2); 9 × depth charges:
    • Ning Hai only: 6 × 8 cm/40 3rd Year Type anti-aircraft guns (6 x 1); 8 x Vickers 2-pounder anti-aircraft guns (8 x 1); 10 × machine guns
    • Ping Hai only: 3 × 3" (76mm) anti-aircraft guns (3 x 1); 4 × 2" (57mm) anti-aircraft guns (4 x 1); 4 × machine guns
  • Armour: Belt: 0.98" (25mm); Deck: 0.752 to 0.98" (19mm to 25mm); Turrets: 0.98" (25mm); Conning Tower: 25 mm (0.98 in)
  • Aircraft carried: 2 x floatplanes (Ning Hai only)
The two Thai ships (the Thonburi-class) were sometimes referred to as 'pocket heavy cruisers', as they carried the same 8-inch guns as the Japanese Navy's heavy cruisers. However, their speed was more in keeping with their role as coastal defence ships.


The Thonburi-class's characteristics were:
  • Displacement: 2,265 tons
  • Dimensions:
    • Length: 251ft (76.0m)
    • Beam: 47ft 4 in (14.43m)
    • Draught: 13ft 8in (4.17m)
  • Propulsion: 2 x MAN diesels driving 2 propellers
  • Speed: 15.5 knots
  • Range: 11,100 nautical miles
  • Complement: 234
  • Armament: 4 × 8" (203mm) guns (2 x 2); 4 × 3" (76mm) anti-aircraft guns (4 x 1); 4 × 40mm anti-aircraft guns (4 x 1); 4 x 20mm anti-aircraft guns (4 x 1)
  • Armour: Belt: 2.5" (64mm); Turrets: 4" (102mm); Barbettes: 4" (102mm); Decks: 1" to 1.5" (25mm to 38mm); Control Tower: 4" (102mm)
These two classes make an interesting comparison, especially as the Japanese never built equivalent ships for their own navy. They preferred to use obsolete and partially re-armed armoured cruisers, although they did take the Chinese ships into service in 1944 as escort ships. Both had been sunk by Japanese aircraft in 1937, and had subsequently been raised and used as training vessels and barracks ships (Ning Hai became Mikura and Ping Hai became Mishima). Both ships were renamed when they were returned to service as escort ships, Ning Hai becoming Ioshima, and Ping Hai became Yasoshima. They were sunk by the US Navy on 19th September (Ioshima) and 25th September 1944 (Yasoshima).

4 comments:

  1. Those Thai warships look interesting: heavy metal for such a small vessel - not a whole lot bigger than a destroyer. I wonder who wrote the design specification? The Japanese also built a class of small submarine chasers. One of them actually caught one in the Sea of Japan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Archduke Piccolo,

      The design of the Thai coastal defence ships was based on an earlier pair of ships built by Vickers. The Japanese enlarged the concept, and when compared, the two classes bear some resemblance to each other.

      The Thais were obviously planning to be a power in the region, and had two light cruisers designed and built in Italy, although they were never finished or delivered due to the outbreak of the Second World War.

      To me, the Japanese-designed subchasers look like miniature destroyers/torpedo boats, and were certainly as good as their equivalents serving in other navies.

      All the best,

      Bob

      Delete
    2. I have model of one of those sub-chasers - came with a US(?) submarine and a bomber. The sub is about twice as long as the 'chaser'. I thought to insert it among my 'mighty Armadas' inventory as a destroyer, but I'm not so sure about that. Years ago (I discover) I began as series of 5 cardboard destroyers on the German 'Richard Beitzen' model. I think I'll finish those shortly. They won't be very good as models, but they'll serve (I hope).

      Delete
    3. Archduke Piccolo,

      It sounds as if the model subchaser would make an ideal 'Mighty Armada' destroyer ... and the cardboard model destroyers sound as if they will be interesting additions.

      All the best,

      Bob

      Delete

Thank you for leaving a comment. Please note that any comments that are spam or contain phishing messages or that come from Google Accounts that are 'Unknown' will be deleted.