Pages

Thursday, 26 June 2025

The Battle of Omdurman refought using Dominion of the Spear and Bayonet

Background to the battle

Following the fall of Khartoum in 1885, the British and Egyptians withdrew from the Sudan. Under British leadership, the Egyptian Army was reformed, better trained, and expanded, and by 1896 the Khedival forces - led by General Herbert Kitchener, the Sirdar (or Commander) of the Egyptian Army - were ready to return to the Sudan and destroy the Mahdists.

The offensive was a relatively slow but very deliberate one, with each stage planned to prepare for the next. On 21st September 1896, Dongola was captured, and Abu Hamed followed on 7th August 1897. At the Battle of the Atbara River on 7th April 1898, Mahdist forces - led by Osman Digna and Khalifa Abdullah - were decisively beaten and the line of march along the River Nile to Khartoum was open. On 1st September 1898, the Anglo-Egyptian army - with the support of a powerful flotilla of gunboats - arrived at Karary, some seven miles from Omdurman - the capital of the Mahdist state - where the Mahdist army was encamped.

The British force comprised:

  • Attached British troops
    • 21st Lancers
    • 32nd Field Battery, Royal Artillery
    • 37th Howitzer Battery, Royal Artillery
    • Two 40-pounder guns, Royal Artillery
  • First Infantry Division (commanded by Major General Gatacre)
    • 1st Brigade (commanded by Brigadier General Wauchope)
      • 1st Battalion, Royal Warwickshire Regiment
      • 1st Battalion, Lincolnshire Regiment
      • 1st Battalion, Seaforth Highlanders
      • 1st Battalion, Queen’s Own Cameron Highlanders
      • 6 Maxim guns
      • Detachment, Royal Engineers
    • 2nd Brigade (commanded by Brigadier General Lyttelton)
      • 1st Battalion, Grenadier Guards
      • 1st Battalion, Northumberland Fusiliers
      • 2nd Battalion, Lancashire Fusiliers
      • 2nd Battalion, Rifle Brigade
      • 4 Maxim guns
      • Detachment, Royal Engineers
  • Attached Egyptian troops
    • 9 Squadrons, Egyptian Cavalry
    • 1 Battery, Egyptian Horse Artillery
    • 4 Field Batteries, Egyptian Artillery
    • 10 Maxim guns
    • 8 Companies, Camel Corps
  • Second Division (commanded by Major General Hunter)
    • 1st Brigade (commanded by Colonel Macdonald)
      • 2nd Egyptian Infantry Battalion
      • IX Sudanese Infantry Battalion
      • X Sudanese Infantry Battalion
      • XI Sudanese Infantry Battalion
    • 2nd Brigade (commanded by Colonel Maxwell)
      • 8th Egyptian Infantry Battalion
      • XII Sudanese Infantry Battalion
      • XIII Sudanese Infantry Battalion
      • XIV Sudanese Infantry Battalion
    • 3rd Brigade (commanded by Colonel Lewis)
      • 3rd Egyptian Infantry Battalion
      • 4th Egyptian Infantry Battalion
      • 7th Egyptian Infantry Battalion
      • 15th Egyptian Infantry Battalion
    • 4th Brigade (commanded by Colonel Collinson)
      • 1st Egyptian Infantry Battalion
      • 5th Egyptian Infantry Battalion
      • 17th Egyptian Infantry Battalion
      • 18th Egyptian Infantry Battalion
    • Camel Transport

It is estimated that the Mahdist force numbered approximately 50,000.

The course of the battle

The battle began around 6.00am. Some 8,000 men under Osman Azrak advanced straight at the waiting Anglo-Egyptian force. These were followed by a similar number of troops who had been waiting to the northwest. The Anglo-Egyptian artillery opened fire when the advancing Mahdists were just under two miles away from the leading Anglo-Egyptian troops, and inflicted severe casualties on the Mahdists. The latter continued their advance until they came into range of the Anglo-Egyptian Maxim guns and infantry. This frontal attack faltered in the face of this firepower and none of the attackers got closer than 50 yards from the Anglo-Egyptian frontline units. A flanking move on the right was also checked, and there were bloody clashes on the opposite flank that scattered the Mahdist forces there.

Whilst the Anglo–Egyptian infantry were causing significant casualties on the Mahdists, the cavalry and camel corps that were deployed to north of the main force were threatened by about 15,000 Mahdists. The commander of the Anglo-Egyptian mounted troops attempted to use his cavalry to draw away some of the advancing Mahdists whilst the camelry moved towards the infantry’s zariba. Two gunboats moved so they could use their guns to support the cavalry and prevent a Mahdist attack on the zariba’s flank.

Kitchener then ordered his army to advance on Omdurman in several columns. The 21st Lancers were sent ahead to clear the route to Omdurman. Unfortunately, they were attacked by 2,500 Mahdists who were hidden in a depression. After a short but bloody skirmish clash, the Lancers drove the Mahdists off.

The Anglo-Egyptian force moved left in echelon towards the Surkab ridge and then towards the south. During the advance, the rear was a brigade of 3,000 mainly Sudanese troops was at the rear, and this force was unexpectedly threatened by 15,000 enemy troops who came from behind the ridge. The brigade turned to face the oncoming Mahdists, and despite intense pressure, they held their position and caused considerable casualties. Further infantry and the Maxim guns were diverted to support the Sudanese, and the Mahdist forces were forced to retreat in considerable disorder.

Now that this threat was eliminated, the advance continued and Omdurman was occupied.


THE REFIGHT

The forces involved

Mahdists

  • 1 x Cavalry
  • 5 x Spearmen

British

  • 1 x Cavalry
  • 1 x Dismounted Cavalry (Skirmishers)
  • 2 x Elite Disciplined Infantry

Opening positions

Turn 1

The Mahdist Spearmen attacked the British Line Infantry in the left sector. The Mahdist Spearmen threw a 3 ...

... and in reply the British Line Infantry threw a 4 (plus 1 for being Elite) and destroyed the Mahdist Spearmen.

The Mahdists moved a unit of Spearmen into the left sector to replace the destroyed Mahdist Spearmen.

The British Line Infantry attacked the Mahdist Spearmen in the centre sector. The British Line Infantry threw a 6 (plus 1 for being Elite) ...

... and destroyed the Mahdist Spearmen.

The Mahdists moved their remaining unit of Spearmen into the centre sector to replace the destroyed Mahdist Spearmen.

Turn 2

The Mahdist Spearmen attacked the British Line Infantry in the left sector. The Mahdist Spearmen threw a 2 ...

... and in reply the British Line Infantry threw a 1 (plus 1 for being Elite).

Neither side suffered any casualties.

The British Line Infantry attacked the Mahdist Spearmen in the centre sector. The British Line Infantry threw a 6 (plus 1 for being Elite) ...

... and destroyed the Mahdist Spearmen.

The Mahdists moved their Cavalry into the centre sector to replace the destroyed Mahdist Spearmen.

Turn 3

The Mahdist Cavalry attacked the British Line Infantry in the centre sector. The Mahdist cavalry threw a 1 ...

... and in reply the British Line Infantry threw a 5 (pus 1 for being Elite) ..

... and destroyed the Mahdist Cavalry.

The British Line Infantry attacked the Mahdist Spearmen in the left sector. The British Line Infantry threw a 6 (plus 1 for being Elite) ...

... and destroyed the Mahdist Spearmen.

... and won the battle!


A video version of this battle report can be found here on the Wargaming Miscellany YouTube channel.

12 comments:

  1. Nice to see that you're managing to fit some games in Bob, with some very nice dice throwing on the British side !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maudlin Jack Tar,

      It was a great little wargame … and the dice certainly seemed to favour the Anglo-Egyptians!

      All the best,

      Bob

      Delete
  2. Nice report, Bob - the dice gods were certainly with the British!
    It does make me wonder about how to depict battles where there is a large difference in numbers between the armies - here we had masses of low-grade Mahdists vs. fewer high-quality British. Did you simply assume that a Mahdist 'unit' represented more men than a British one? Given the Elite British infantry, it seems it would be quite difficult for the Mahdi to win..
    I am wondering if the difference in numbers might be represented by having more units for the Mahdists, with the extra units simply stacked up in the reserve area, so the British have to destroy more units to win. Given their Elite infantry units advantage, that doesn't seem too great a handicap? Interesting...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. David in Suffolk,

      You raise some very interesting points … and I hope to explore them in greater detail in the near future.

      All the best,

      Bob

      Delete
  3. Bob -
    I look at something like this, and Mark Cordone's FP3x3 system and think 'Campaign in an evening; whole war in an afternoon'. There are other practical advantages as well.

    And then I look at my inventory of stuff and think 'oh, but so much would be left out of the fun!' Tsk, tsk...
    Cheers,
    Ion

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Archduke Piccolo (Ion),

      Your comments are very pertinent as I have been having similar thoughts. Having fought a FP3x3PW campaign, these simple fast wargames have their attractions … but I’m not sure if I’d want to use them exclusively in my future wargames. I still enjoy longer and more complex tabletop battles and do not - as yet - plan to trim my collections.

      All the best,

      Bob

      Delete
  4. A good video and battle, even though it was quite one sided. Fortune favored the Empire on this day!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mark Cordone,

      Cheers! Unfortunately for the Mahdists, the original battle was also very one sided.

      All the best,

      Bob

      Delete
  5. Pretty much went along historical lines!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gary S,

      I’d like to regift it again sometime to see if the Mahdists can actually win.

      All the best,

      Bob

      Delete
  6. So, the winning tactic seems to be “throw high” 😊
    It didn’t help the Mahdist cause by their consistently low dice scores either.
    The stiff upper lip triumphs 😉
    Cheers,
    Geoff

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Elliesdad (Geoff),

      The dice certainly favoured the Anglo-Egyptians … but the result was historically accurate.

      All the best,

      Bob

      Delete

Thank you for leaving a comment. Please note that any comments that are spam or contain phishing messages or that come from Google Accounts that are 'Unknown' will be deleted.