Last February – the 3rd to be exact – I did some thinking about the sort of wargaming that I enjoy, and I wrote the following list on my blog:
- I like to play large-scale, all-day, operational-level wargames – preferably World War II – with a group of friends
- I like to play (and design) small face-to-face or solo wargames that can be fought to a conclusion in a couple of hours
- I like to fight campaigns
- I like to use gridded playing surfaces
- I like to use card-driven turn sequences
- I like to use simple combat resolution systems
- I like to find out about early wargames designers and – if possible – try out their rules.
Recently I have been concentrating on developing a set of operational-level wargames rules. The resulting rules seem to work well and – in my opinion – have potential for further development into an effective method of fighting large-scale battles within a reasonable time frame. This concentration on operational-level wargaming has meant that I have tended to ignore smaller-scale face-to-face and solo wargames, and over recent days my thoughts have returned to that style of wargaming.
The reason for this change of direction is due in no small part to several related stimuli:
- The first is the realisation that the size of my wargames room and wargames ‘table’ actually militates against me fighting large wargames at home.
- The second is the publication of the latest edition of HORDES IN THE TRENCHS (HITT) by Matt Kirkhart on the WHEN TECHNOLOGY MEETS TRADITION group on YAHOO! GROUPS.

The WHEN TECHNOLOGY MEETS TRADITION page on Yahoo! Groups

Paul Farrow’s MRFARROW2U (+JACK & AMYS!!!) DBA 1500 ONWARDS PAGE blog
Most of my wargaming is solo, and as a result the size of the wargames that I fight is not governed by any considerations other than those that I set myself. That said, the size of my wargames room, the storage space available in it, and the size of the tables I can use all place some restraint on what I can or cannot do.

My wargames room
The room is approximately 13 feet long and 10 feet wide, with a large window across one end. Other than a door in the corner of one of the long sides, the other walls are taken up with bookcases and storage cupboards. The centre of the room is occupied by my tables, which are both 3 feet x 2 feet unextended – which is how they are usually set up – and 3 feet x 4 feet when extended. This gives me a total table area that can be either 6 feet x 4 feet or 8 feet x 3 feet. When the tables are extended there is just enough room to get around them to fight a wargame, but it is almost impossible to get terrain and figures out of the storage system.
Here lies the rub; I can set up largish wargames on the extended tables, but they can be difficult and time consuming to set up (and take down) or I can set up smaller wargames (e.g. using the TABLE TOP BATTLES rules) which I can put on at almost no notice and little inconvenience. Since I started this blog I have tended to fight smaller wargames much more frequently than I did before, and I have enjoyed the experience.
As I stated above, I like to fight campaigns because a series of linked battles seems to more satisfying than ‘one off’ battles. Paul Farrow’s
blog has reports of the Sudan and Boxer Rebellion colonial campaigns he has fought using a variant of DBA. I liked the look of what he has achieved and feel that it is something that I could and should emulate.
I have now begun to realise that although I like fighting large wargames, the space I have available makes it impractical to do so on a regular basis. I am therefore drawn to the conclusion that it would be far better for me to concentrate my efforts on smaller wargames that I can fight regularly. It means that I can then build up lots of small armies – which I will use – and I will not lose heart or interest before a project is complete. It will also be much easier to fight campaigns where one battle leads on to the next rather than ‘one-off’ battles, which is what my larger wargames tend to be. I will still be able to prepare for large wargames, but these can be special occasions rather than the norm.