Over the past couple of days, I have been making slow but steady progress on the book. David Crook’s naval wargame rules are in the final stages of their first proof reading, and I have been doing the book’s layout as I have been adding the text to the book’s template.
I have sketched out a plan for the book’s content, although this may well change as the book develops. At present my plan looks like this:
- Introduction and acknowledgements
- Military innovations of the mid nineteenth century
- Brigade-level wargame rules + battle report
- Divisional-level wargame rules + battle report
- Corps-level wargame rules + battle report
- Naval wargame rules + battle report
- Chronology of the American Civil War
- Bibliography
Looking forward to seeing these in print !
ReplyDeleteThe Good Soldier Svjek,
DeleteI want to get it published well before the end of the year.
All the best,
Bob
Hello there Bob,
ReplyDeleteReally excited to be a part of this! The format looks like it will hit the spot in terms of variety of content for sure.
All the best,
DC
David Crook,
DeleteI hope that you are right. I expect that it will sell better than TPP&SW book.
All the best,
Bob
Hi Bob,
ReplyDeleteTo do a collaboration for your ACW book is certainly a good thing to do- I'm sure you will be successful as has been the case with your previous publications. Look forward to seeing some photos of the ACW miniatures. All the best. KEV.
Kev Robertson (Kev),
DeleteI could have written the whole book myself, but other people have come up with much better ideas for PACWW than I could have, so it makes eminent sense to get them onboard.
All the best,
Bob
Excellent news on the progress Bob. You can count me in for a copy when it’s published.
ReplyDeleteCheers,
Geoff
Elliesdad (Geoff),
DeleteI’ll try not to disappoint you!
All the best,
Bob
Can I ask how specific to the ACW it is? Would the rules suitable for European mid to late 19c too?
ReplyDeleteCheers Jon S
Quid Nunc (Jon S),
DeleteWhilst primarily an book about wargaming the ACW, the rules (both land and naval) will be suitable for wars up to the end of the 1870s. I could easily add an extra chapter that would give pointers as to how to adapt the rules for other wars.
All the best,
Bob
I think that would really be a way to extend the value of the book!
DeleteJon S
Quid Nunc (Jon S),
DeleteYou are probably right ... and I will probable do as you suggest.
All the best,
Bob
Magic!
DeleteQuid Nunc,
DeleteWe try to please our readers.
All the best,
Bob
Already on my Xmas list!
ReplyDeleteJfidz,
DeleteExcellent! I hope you enjoy it when it is published.
All the best,
Bob
A traditional setting for wargames, (as far back as the "Tin Army of the Potomac", even before Featherstone and Grant etc.
ReplyDeleteI'm sure this book will be a hit.
Ross Mac,
DeleteThe ACW was the first war for which I had two matching Airfix armies, and its always been a favourite of mine.
I hope that the book is a success.
All the best,
Bob
Bob,
ReplyDeleteSeeing this is like telling a little kid, Christmas is coming and it's ONLY 10 months away! Torture! Waiting anxiously :)
Dale
Dalethewargamer,
DeleteThe time will slip by in a trice ... and I hope that the tortured wait will be worth it!
All the best,
Bob
Bob, it occurs to me that, rather than including suggestions for adapting the PACW rules to late 19th century Europe - surely a future PW book in its own right? - you might consider adding a variant (or advice for adapting your Napoleonic rules) for the Mexican War of 1845, in which many ACW generals first distinguished themselves.
ReplyDeleteRegards, Arthur
Arthur1815 (Arthur),
DeleteAnother book is a possibility, but the naval rules were always written to incorporate post-ACW actions. I certainly think that a chapter pointing out how the rules can be used for the post-ACW era will help to improve the book’s appeal ... and might be a ‘come on’ for a later book!
I did consider writing a PORTABLE AMERICAN WARS WARGAME book, but came to the conclusion it would be a bit of a monster. That said, writing it might be a long term possibility I ought to look at.
All the best,
Bob