Pages

Wednesday 22 December 2021

Burnt! (Queimada): A source for a mini-campaign set during the 1840s and 1850s?

My wife is of the opinion that I will watch pretty well any war film that is broadcast on TV, and to a certain extent, she is right. I do draw the line with some films, particularly those that have been badly made or are downright inaccurate. The worst of the ones I have watched recently was OPERATION DUNKIRK ... which was so bad that I had to watch it to the end to see just how bad it got!*

BURNT! (which in Italian was known as QUEIMADA) is a completely different kettle of fish. It is an Italian-made film starring Marlon Brando that was directed by Gillo Pontecorvo, and that has a musical score by Ennio Morricone. The story is set during the 1840s and 1850s on a fictional island in the Caribbean and concerns the actions of a British government agent (Brando) who first destabilises the existing colonial government by engineering a slave revolt and then returns to overthrow the government that replaced the colonial power and suppress a revolt against British rule by proxy.

Brando's character is named Sir William Walker (a very obvious reference to the American filibuster of the same name who was very active in Central America during the 1850s), and the island – which is called Queimada – is supposed to be a Portuguese colony somewhere in the Lesser Antilles.

(It is worth noting that the only Portuguese colony in the Americas was Brazil, and Queimada should have been a Spanish colony. At the time the film was made General Franco was still in change in Spain, and the film company changed the colonial power from Spanish to Portuguese so as not to offend him and to ensure that it was not banned from being shown in Spain!)

On his arrival on Queimada in 1844, Walker befriends a local man – José Dolores – whom he persuades to lead a slave rebellion against the Portuguese rulers. The Portuguese Governor is killed during the rebellion, thus assuring its success, and Walker establishes a puppet regime led by a local plantation owner named Teddy Sanchez. Sanchez is kept in power by the British-owned Antilles Royal Sugar Company, who have taken over the output of the island's sugar plantations ... which was the real reason behind the ejection of the Portuguese.

Within four years Dolores has led a revolt against the new government, and by 1854 the situation is so bad that Walker is brought back to suppress the revolt and pacifying the island. Walker engineers a coup which results in the removal and execution of Sanchez.

The execution of Sanchez.

British troops are then 'invited' to land on the island to assist in its pacification. They provide support for the island's own army and within a short time the rebellion is crushed, and Dolores is captured and – despite Walker's efforts to save him – later executed.

The capture of Dolores by Walker.

The film ends with Walker being stabbed to death as he is about to leave the island.

I think that quite a few of my regular blog readers will agree that the plot of this film is not a bad little scenario for a mini-campaign set somewhere a bit exotic and out of the ordinary. The British infantry are seen wearing uniforms that reasonably accurate, but the artillery looks as if they are wearing uniforms similar to those worn by the West India Regiment after 1856. The local troops are seen wearing a uniform that has a blue tailcoat, grey trousers, and a tarred top hat similar to that worn by the Royal Marines during the Napoleonic Wars.


* Some of the goofs identified by contributors to IMDb include:

  • The evacuation of Dunkirk/Dunkerque took place from 26th May to 4th June 4 1940. Despite this, some of the troops are supposed to be British paratroops (the first British parachute troops were not formed until after the evacuation) and they are shown wearing red berets, which were not introduced into service until 1942. Some are even shown wearing the American M1 helmet, which was not issued until 1941.
  • They 'British' troops are seen driving around in US Army vehicles, including a Willys Jeep ... which did not come into service until 1941. They are also seen carrying Thompson submachine guns, a weapon that was not introduced into the British Army until after the evacuation.
  • The German troops are seen wearing wearing modern green, black, and brown camouflaged uniforms.
  • The plot involves 'crack' (or should that read 'crap') British troops going behind the German frontline to find a scientist whose work could 'win the war' ... and this is at a time when most of the British Army was trying to get to Dunkirk so that they could be evacuated, and the Germans were pushing them back.

17 comments:

  1. It does sound like rather an interesting film....I might see if I can track it down via YouTube

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ross,

      It is well worth seeking out. It is available on YouTube here = https://youtu.be/V7a52pd7w1w

      All the best,

      Bob

      Delete
  2. Burnt was shown on TV last night. I’ll look out for it in case it comes on again. Sounds interesting and a little covered subject.

    As for Operation Dunkirk, it too was on recently, but the blurb had the telltale signs of a BAD film so I gave it a swerve.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nundanket,

      It has been shown twice in the last week on the LONDON LIVE Freeview TV channel, and will doubt be shown again very soon.

      You were right to give OPERATION DUNKIRK a miss. What I did see wasted time that I could have used watching something better … like paint drying!

      All the best,

      Bob

      Delete
  3. I saw this movie back in the 80's (I taped it on my VCR) and for many years was one of my favorites. I have often thought of using it for a narrative campaign. I was even thinking of trying to get some Hinton Hunt Marines to. use for the Queimadian army.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jhnptrqn,

      I’d never seen or heard of this film until I saw it earlier this week, and I’m surprised that it isn’t better known. Brando said it was the best film he ever made, and I can see why.

      If you ever do create a Queimadian Army, I’d love to see it!

      All the best,

      Bob

      Delete
  4. Hi Bob -
    The thing reminds me of another yarn set in the Caribbean involving an island revolt. Can't remember the author or the title, but as I recall, the baddies were defeated by a hurricane. Turns out the eye of the hurricane passed over the seacoast capital city, which the baddies had just captured the day before, coinciding with an unusually high tide. The baddies' fate was that of the Pharoah's army in the Red Sea...

    I recall it as a goodish sort of yarn of the paperback thriller type, which probably explains my having forgotten its provenance.

    But something of the sort would make a reasonable modernish campaign, and all. A different version perhaps of the 'Long Live the Revolution' campaign.

    Cheers,
    Ion

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bob -
      It's possible the novel I'm thinking of is 'Wyatt's Hurricane' by Desmond Bagley.
      Cheers -

      Delete
    2. Archduke Piccolo (Ion),

      Having read the synopsis of WYATT’S HURRICANE, that would seem to be the plot you outlined in your first comment.

      I agree with you that both BURN! and WYATT’S HURRICANE would make quite good bases for ‘Long Live the Revolution’ mini-campaigns. It’s certainly something to think about.

      All the best,

      Bob

      Delete
  5. I'm glad to say that I haven't seen the Dunkirk film, though special forces rescuing a scientist is a scenario that I have played as a game.
    The Queimada scenario has definite appeal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maudlin Jack Tar,

      Avoid OPERATION DUNKIRK like the plague! There is nothing ‘special’ about the troops featured in the film other than they are especially bad!

      I have British Napoleonic figures that I could use to refight the Queimada scenario, and at a pinch some of the French Napoleonic figures in my collection might make passable stand ins for Queimadian Army troops.

      All the best,

      Bob

      Delete
  6. I also have a tendency to stop and watch any war movie that comes on tv, but that doesn't seem to happen often these days. I can't remember the last time it did. But I only have antenna tv, which mostly seems to run things like old tv series and sports, and a limited set of other programming. War movies can be a good source if inspiration for scenarios and campaigns.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fitz-Badger,

      In the runup to Christmas, there have been quite a few on the TV channels I can access. So far I have watched DR ZHIVAGO (not a war film - so my wife doesn't object!) but it does have some interesting battle scenes and I hope to watch THE BATTLE OF THE RIVER PLATE later today.

      One channel that does put out an interesting selection of old films etc., is TALKING PICTURES. It is run by a father and daughter out of an annex to their house in Hertfordshire, and besides loads of old episodes of TV series, it includes quite a number of old war films.

      All the best,

      Bob

      Delete
  7. Never heard of the film Bob but as you have said, it certainly has the makings for a good mini-campaign. I suppose you could use the Madasahatta map and work from there?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Steve J.,

      I understand that it is being transmitted again later tonight on LONDON LIVE, so if you can get access, try to see it.

      The Madasahatta map would certainly be a good basis for a campaign map, although a simple, stylised Snakes & Ladders campaign might be easier.

      All the best,

      Bob

      Delete
  8. Bob,
    I realize this is tardy to the party, but talking about bad war movies always brings to mind those mind-bending epics of all time, "The Battle of the Bulge" and "Where Eagles Dare". Bulge lets you know early on that there's rough sledding ahead: the narrator begins, "1944--as the Allies faced the German Army, with Monty and his 8th Army on the left flank, and Patton and his 3rd Army on the right...." Uh oh--and it doesn't get better. Highlights include Telly Savalas pulling a .50 cal machine gun off his M41 Walker Bulldog and firing it by hand; Henry Fonda as the only guy on the Allied side who figured out the Germans were short of fuel; the Spanish Army, whose American M47 tanks were painted grey to stand in for the panzers; and apparently because the Spaniards wanted their tanks back, the studio was obliged to film the end of the movie in sunny, rocky Spain, where not a snowflake could be found.

    Eagles also begins stupidly, as we watch German officers fly to a mountain castle on a helicopter that was not invented until after the Korean War. Later on, Clint Eastwood kills a German platoon by holding his Tommy gun blindly around a corner and firing away.

    Assuming they are not unwatchable (the Dunkirk film, obviously), at least bad movies may provide a source of amusement...But it is still a bit sad that history is so lightly regarded that studios will spend time, money, and effort making such schlock, and get away with it. One reviewer actually gave 3 stars to both of these pictures! Obviously a recent escapee from an asylum.

    Best regards,
    Chris Johnson

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Chris (Chris Johnson),

      Have you ever read WATCHIN WAR FILMS WITH MY DAD by Al Murrya? (It is available as a paperback from Amazon: ISBN 978-0099580348) He is a British comedian and very good amateur military historian who does a podcast with James Holland, and read he Modern History at Oxford. His book is about all sorts of aspects of military history, but especially 'bad' war films ... which he would watch with his father, who was a Lt Col in the Para Engineers.

      My own father could not watch THE BATTLE OF THE BULGE without exploding into indignation. He served with 6th Airborne Division, and they were involved in the British part of the fighting. The absence of trees and snow in the film particularly irked him, as his abiding memories were of the forests and the cold!

      WHERE EAGLES DARE is a great adventure film, but by no means an accurate war one. It regularly appears on TV at around Christmas time (along with DIE HARD!) and you can be guaranteed to have a couple of hours of escapist fun ... just as long is you don't take it too seriously! I know that in most groups of middle-aged men, mention of the phrase 'Broadsword calling Danny Boy' will get a very positive reaction!

      All the best,

      Bob

      PS. ZULU is a great film ... but historically inaccurate. That said, it doesn't stop me enjoying watching it several times a year.

      Delete

Thank you for leaving a comment. Please note that any comments that are spam or contain phishing messages or that come from Google Accounts that are 'Unknown' will be deleted.