Pages

Thursday, 17 April 2025

Other people’s Portable Wargames: The Battle of Caesar’s Hill

Professor Gary Sheffield recently completed the first battle of a solo campaign that pitted the army of Byzantium against the Seljuk Turks. The following text and photographs were featured in three posts he wrote on the Portable Wargame Facebook page.

Background to the campaign

It is May 1000, and following their victory, the Byzantines under Demis Roussos have pursued the Seljuk Turks to near the gates of the city of Edessa. Although the new sultan, Shish Kebab, sued for peace (i.e. the strategic die role reduced the level of hostility towards Byzantium) the Byzantine terms were too stiff and therefore the Turks decided to fight on.

Eager to exploit what they were believed was disarray in the Turks' ranks, the Byzantine sent an advanced guard westward towards Caesar's Hill, a strategically important piece of high land on the otherwise pretty featureless Edessa plain (the hill was named after a Roman commander who had passed that way some 800 years before). The Turks had likewise dispatched a rear-guard eastward towards Caesar's Hill, and the result was a classic encounter battle with units coming on in dribs and drabs, with the battle swinging first one way and then the other.

Turn 1

Turn 2

Turn 3

Turn 6

Turn 7

Turn 8

Turn 9

Turn 14

Turn 16

This was a resounding Byzantine victory – albeit one that was only sealed on the very last move.

Thoughts on the battle

This was a very entertaining game. The nature of the scenario, with the piecemeal arrival of reinforcements, decided by roles of the dice, both for their timing and their place of arrival, meant that this was a very 'bitty' and unpredictable battle. For most of the battle the Seljuk Turks seem to have the upper hand, only for the Byzantine Heavy Cavalry, led by General Demis Roussos, to arrive in the nick of time. Somehow I miscounted and played 16 turns rather than 15. Clearly it was a very bright moon that night which enabled the battle to continue into the hours of darkness.


Please note that the photographs featured above are © Professor Gary Sheffield.

16 comments:

  1. Thanks, Bob. Purists will be horrified but I used whatever ancient/medieval figures I had to hand to stand in for the real forces.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gary S,

      Would purists have enjoyed this wargame any better? I doubt it! This is supposed to be a fun hobby, not an exercise for button-counters!

      All the best,

      Bob

      Delete
    2. Bob -
      'Purists'?? Have done with purists! The 'barbarian' types in my own 'Byzantiad' ... thing ... are represented by pretty much the same figures, whether Bulgar, Georgian (Abasgian), or Fatimid Egyptian!
      Cheers,
      Ion

      Delete
    3. Archduke Piccolo (Ion),

      I agree. One of the things I loved about Peter Laing’s 15mm figures was the fact that they were so generic that it was possible to use them to represent a wide variety of alternative figures,

      All the best,

      Bob

      Delete
  2. Thanks for posting this, Bob:- Gary’s report was a very good example of Portable Wargame in action, which some of the non-fb readers of your blog will be happy to read. I enjoyed it very much. 👍🏼 (one of my favourite OHW scenarios, too).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Martin. I fought the follow up battle vs Bob yesterday, which will no doubt be covered on this blog at some point.

      Delete
    2. Martin S.

      As Gary pointed out in his comment, I was able to provide him with a live, online opponent … albeit not a very good one!

      All the best,

      Bob

      Delete
    3. Gary S,

      Thanks for the opportunity to take part in yesterday’s wargame. I had great fun!

      All the best,

      Bob

      Delete
  3. That looks like it was a very entertaining game. I'm looking forward to the sequel.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mark Cordone,

      The sequel was great fun … and my battle report will be appearing on my blog very soon.

      All the best,

      Bob

      Delete
  4. Looks like an interesting scenario and a great game. Thanks for putting this on Blogger for those of us that don't do Facebook Bob.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maudlin Jack Tar,

      In a couple of days you’ll be able to read the sequel!

      All the best,

      Bob

      Delete
  5. Bob -
    Reading this post and looking at the action put me in mind of my own 'Byzantiad' project over the last 12 months, and the Empire's battles with the Bulgars. The thought occurred to me that the kind of scrambling battle Professor Sheffield's action seems to be depicting is the sort of thing the Balkan topography might induce. Having read Anna Comnena's accounts of the Emperor Alexius's early battles, they give the impression also of something rather scrappy, with less than the usual reliance on formal battle lines.

    I'm guessing, of course. But I recall one comment upon one of my larger Byzantine battles that it had more the look of a small campaign, rather than a single battle.

    Food for thought, anyhow...
    Cheers,
    Ion

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Archduke Piccolo (Ion),

      I am given to understand that it was your article in PWC3 that was the inspiration behind Gary Sheffield’s mini-campaign.

      If you thought that is was a scrambling, scrappy battle, wait until you read about my attempts to beat the Byzantines in today’s blog post!

      All the best,

      Bob

      Delete
    2. Archduke Piccolo,

      So am I!

      All the best,

      Bob

      Delete

Thank you for leaving a comment. Please note that any comments that are spam or contain phishing messages or that come from Google Accounts that are 'Unknown' will be deleted.