Pages

Wednesday 6 November 2024

‘We feel just as heavy as lead …’

On Monday afternoon Sue and I had our annual ‘flu jabs and COVID booster jabs … and on Tuesday we both felt under the weather. Neither of us seemed to have any energy or motivation to do anything, and Sue summed it as feeling as if our bodies just felt heavy.

Judging by what I’ve read on the Internet, the current ‘flu jab seems to have this as a common side effect and this feeling should pass in a couple of days. In the meantime, I’m trying to motivate myself to do my daily exercises and do some sorting out in my toy/wargameroom.


The title of this post comes from the chorus of the song ‘Oh! What a Lovely War’.

Oh! Oh! Oh! it's a lovely war,
Who wouldn't be a soldier eh?
Oh! It's a shame to take the pay.
As soon as reveille is gone
We feel just as heavy as lead,
But we never get up till the sergeant brings
Our breakfast up to bed
Oh! Oh! Oh! it's a lovely war,
What do we want with eggs and ham
When we've got plum and apple jam?
Form fours! Right turn!
How shall we spend the money we earn?
Oh! Oh! Oh! it's a lovely war.

Monday 4 November 2024

Taking a stroll …

My mobility has been gradually improving over the last fortnight, in no small part due to support by a therapy assistant from the Royal Borough Greenwich Community Rehabilitation and Short Term Assessment Team. They have encouraged me to try doing things that I was unsure that I’d still be able to do, and as a result I have learned how to get in and out of Sue’s car, and this has enabled me to get out and about.

They also provided me with a stroller so that I can use it to walk further and faster than I’ve been able to just using my walking stick. The stroller has four wheels, the front two being able to rotate so that it can be steered. It also has handbrakes and a seat so that if I feel tired, I can lock the brakes and sit down to rest and recuperate.

To date I’ve used the stroller twice to go up to the local postbox, which is some distance uphill from our house. Sue and I have also managed to get the stroller into the back of her car so that we could go to Charlton Park for a walk … followed by lunch in the cafe - Frilly’s - inside Charlton House.

With luck, using the stroller will help to improve my ability to walk as well as giving me the sort of exercise that will gradually improve my stamina.

When I look back at how far my mobility has improved over the past two months, I’ve gone from being a bed bound patient who had to be washed and dressed by carers and hoisted in and out of bed to someone who can get out of bed unaided, who can wash and dress themselves, and who can walk with the aid of a walking stick and a stroller.

One wonders how much better my mobility will be by Christmas.

Sunday 3 November 2024

The United States’ response to the late nineteenth century South American naval arms race

When the Civil War ended in 1865, the United States Navy had one of the strongest navies in the world. Admittedly, the fleet was not a deep water one, and mainly comprised armoured monitors and gunboats, but it was capable of defending the nation’s coastline from any potential enemy.

However, by 1880 the active US Navy had shrunk to a fraction of its size fifteen years before, and the growing strength of the Argentinian, Brazilian, and Chilean Navies left it unable to protect the nation’s shores. The matter was debated in the US Congress, and the head of the House Naval Affairs Committee - Hilary A. Herbert - stated that 'if all this old navy of ours were drawn up in battle array in mid-ocean and confronted by Riachuelo (the newly-ordered Brazilian battleship) it is doubtful whether a single vessel bearing the American flag would get into port.'

An internal side view and deck plan of the Riachuelo.
The completed Riachuelo. The similarity of the design of the Riachuelo to that of the USS Maine is apparent.

The Naval Advisory Board had been debating the problem since 1881, and in keeping with the isolationist policies propounded by successive administrations, the Board was unable to reach a conclusion. Some members argued for the development of a fleet of fast commerce raiders whereas others argued that some sort of coastal defence forces. The decision by the Brazilians to order the building of the Riachuelo galvanised the Board’s deliberations and plans were drawn up for the building of two modern armoured warships.

The Bureau of Construction and Repair (C & R) - who were responsible for the design, construction, conversion, procurement, maintenance, and repair of ships used by the United States Navy - presented two designs to William Collins Whitney, the Secretary of the Navy. One of the ships was a 7,500 ton battleship and the other was a 5,000 ton armoured cruiser. After some deliberation, the Secretary decided to request that Congress vote funds for the construction of two 6,000 ton warships, and this was authorised in August 1886.

As the design of such large modern ships was at that time beyond the capabilities of the United States, it was decided to hold a design contest. A number of naval architects were asked to submit designs for the two ships, and the resulting designs became the battleship USS Texas and the armoured cruiser USS Maine. (USS Maine is sometimes described as being a second-class battleship.)

USS Texas

The ship's characteristics are:

  • Displacement: 6,316 tons
  • Dimensions:
    • Length: 308ft 10in (94.1m)
    • Beam: 64ft 1in (19.5m)
    • Draught: 24ft 6in (7.5m)
  • Propulsion: 4 x double-ended boilers providing steam to 2 vertical triple-expansion 8,610ihp steam engines, each driving a propellor.
  • Speed:17.8 knots
  • Complement: 392 officers
  • Armament: 2 × 1 12-inch (305mm) Mark 1 L/35 BL guns; 4 × 1 6-inch (152mm) Mark 3 L/30 BL guns; 2 × 1 6-inch (152mm) Mark 3 L/35 BL guns; 12 × 1 QF 6-pounder (57mm) quick-firing guns; 4 × 1 1-pounder (37mm) Hotchkiss 5-barrelled revolving cannons; 6 × single 1-pounder (37mm) Driggs-Schroeder quick-firing guns; 4 × 14-inch (356mm) torpedo tubes
  • Armour:
    • Belt: 12-inch (305mm)
    • Deck: 1 to 3-inch (25 to 76mm)
    • Citadel: 12-inch (305mm)
    • Turrets: 1 to 3-inch (25 to 76mm)
    • Conning tower: 9-inch (229mm)
    • Bulkheads: 8-inch (203mm)

Service history:

Ordered on 3rd August 1886, she was laid down at Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Portsmouth, Virginia on 1st June 1889. She was launched on 28th June 1892 and commissioned on 15th August 1895.

From the start she seemed to be plagued with problems. Several structural flaws were discovered and Texas required time in dry dock to have her hull strengthened. In September 1895 she ran aground off Newport, Rhode Island, and during the repairs that followed, the ship sank at her moorings as a result of flooding caused by a leak. It was discovered that her watertight doors had been left open and other holes in the bulkhead caused by the need for voice pipes and electrical cables to pass through them had exacerbated the situation.

Once raised, repaired, and back in service, Texas was then assigned to the North Atlantic Squadron, which was based in on the eastern seaboard of the United States. During a visit to Galveston, Texas, in February 1897 she got stuck on a mud bank when high winds blew her onto it. With the aid of a tug, she was able to get off and resumed her service with the North Atlantic Squadron.

When the Spanish-American War broke out, Texas sailed to Cuba as part of the Flying Squadron and took part in the blockade of Santiago de Cuba. As a result, she took part in the Battle of Santiago, during which she fired at and damaged two Spanish cruisers (Vizcaya and Cristobal Colon) as well as two destroyers.

After the war, Texas was decommissioned and undertook a long refit at Norfolk Naval Shipyard, during which her funnel and topmasts were raised, the armour on her main ammunition hoists was doubled in thickness, and her side torpedo tubes were removed.

By 1911 Texas was obsolete and she became a target ship. She was renamed San Marcos in February 1911 so that her original name could be assigned to a new battleship. Under that name she served as a target ship until she was sunk in March 1911. After that her superstructure - which remained above the surface - continued to be used as a target and later as a mooring place for a canvas target screen. The remains of her upperworks and upper hull were destroyed by explosives in January 1959 and what is left of her remains in shallow water in Tangier Sound in Chesapeake Bay.

USS Maine

  • Displacement: 6,682 tons
  • Dimensions:
    • Length: 324ft 4in (98.9m)
    • Beam: 57ft (17.4m)
    • Draught: 22ft 6in (6.9m)
  • Propulsion: 8 x single-ended boilers providing steam to 2 x inverted vertical triple-expansion 9,293ihp steam engines, each driving a propellor.
  • Speed: 16.5 knots
  • Range: 3,600 nautical miles
  • Complement: 374
  • Armament:  2 × 2 10-inch (254 mm) Mark 2 L/30 BL guns; 6 × single 6-inch (152mm) Mark 3 L/30 BL guns; 7 × 1 6-pounder (57mm) Driggs-Schroeder quick-firing guns; 4 × 1 1-pounder (37mm) Hotchkiss quick-firing guns; 4 × 1 1-pounder (37mm) Driggs-Schroeder quick-firing guns: 4 × 0.45-inch Gatling machine guns;  4 × 18-inch (450mm) torpedo tubes
  • Armour:
    • Belt: 12-inch (305mm)
    • Deck: 2 to 3-inch (51 to 76mm)
    • Turrets: 8-inch (203mm)
    • Conning tower: 10-inch (254mm)
    • Bulkheads: 6-inch (152mm)

Service history:

USS Maine was ordered on 3rd August 1886 and was laid down at New York Naval Shipyard on 17th October 1888. She was launched on 18 November 1889 but not commissioned until 17th September 1895! This delay was due to problems with the delivery of armour.

Once she had been commissioned and undertaken several trial and tests, Maine joined the North Atlantic Squadron, which was based in Norfolk, Virginia.

In January 1898, USS Maine - which was then operating out of Key West, Florida - was sent to Havana in Cuba to protect American interests during the ongoing Cuban War of Independence. She reached Havana on 25th January, and at 9.40pm on 15th February - whilst she was an anchor inside the harbour - an explosion occurred aboard her that caused her to sink in a matter of minutes. Of the 355 crew, 261 died as a result of the explosion, 78 were injured, and 16 emerged unhurt.

Although the 'New York Journal' and 'New York World' sensationalized the incident, claiming that the ship had been sunk by a bomb or mine placed by the Spanish, a later 1974 investigation conducted by Admiral Rickover concluded that the explosion had occurred in the forward magazine, and was possibly caused by spontaneous combustion in the coal bunker next to the magazine igniting powder stored therein.

Saturday 2 November 2024

Naval gazing

Over the past few weeks, I’ve been spending a lot of time thinking and writing about late nineteenth and early twentieth century naval history and naval wargaming.

At the age of sixteen it was my ambition to join the Royal Navy and train to be a naval officer … but during a careers interview I was made aware that my eyesight wasn’t good enough to become anything other than an engineer, and I wanted the possibility that I could end up commanding a ship. (During the 1960s engineering officers could not proceed up the career ladder to command a warship. I understand that this situation has not changed.)

I then decided to look at joining the Army, but my scoliosis proved a bar to this career choice. In the end I went into private banking when I left school and eventually, I trained to be a teacher, a career I followed for forty years.

Despite all of these setbacks, I retained my interest in all things naval, and looking at my bookshelves, I have as much space devoted to naval topics as I do to almost everything else. Over the years I’ve taken part in wargames played using Fred Jane’s Naval War Game rules (and created my own set of equipment to fight battles using them) and Fletcher Pratt’s Naval War Game rules. I’ve also written a book of gridded naval wargames and built numerous model wargame ships.

My latest naval research project has involved looking at the various tactics and technologies developed and used by both sides during the Battle of the Atlantic … and I have a suspicion that this might well lead to the development in a game based on my research.

Friday 1 November 2024

Other people's wargames: Maudlin Jack Tar's Hare & Hounds mini-campaign

Over recent weeks, Maudlin Jack Tar has been developing the Hare & Hounds campaign board concept and has actually managed to fight a mini-campaign between two Ancient imagi-nations. His mini-campaign board looked like this:

Maudlin Jack Tar's Hare & Hounds mini-campaign board.

His campaign saw troops of the Vard Republic (whose Legions are indicated by green pins on the following photograph) taking on a confederation of tribes (whose positions are shown by red pins).

The opening positions of both sides. The location of the Vard legions are shown by green pins and positions occupied by the tribal forces are shown by red pins.

The course of the campaign

  • The first battle saw the Vardian Legion II attack the Anacondi tribe ... and resulted in a decisive win for the Vardians.
  • In the second battle the Vardian Legion III fought the Coronithi tribe and the result was far less clear.
  • The third battle involved the Vardian II Legion and the as-yet-untried Brocolii tribe. The result was close to a draw, with both sides suffering casualties.
  • Whilst this battle was being fought, the Vardian Legion III had advanced towards the Coronithi's main town and attacked and captured it.
  • Things were beginning to turn in favour of the Vard republic, especially when they were able to mobilise a new Legion, the IV.
  • Seeking revenge for the loss of their main settlement, the Coronithi engaged the Vardian Legion III but were forced to fall back.
  • In the meantime, the Vardian IV Legion advanced as did the Legion III, who now reached the capital of the tribal confederation. This was garrisoned by Coronithi troops, and in the final battle of the campaign the Vardian forces destroyed the defenders and won the campaign.

Maudlin Jack Tar's battle reports can be found on his blog, Projects & Procrastination here, here, here, and here.

Maudlin Jack Tar has written a simple set of campaign rules that build upon the ones that I wrote back in September. He has also begun to look using a larger version of the Hare & Hounds board. One example that he has shared with me includes stretches of sea along the top and bottom edges of the board, which also bigger than the original design.

An example of Maudlin Jack Tar's expanded Hare & Hounds mini-campaign board.

Interestingly, I had been thinking along similar lines, but my ideas are still confined to a few pencil sketches in a notebook and are nowhere near as developed as Maudlin Jack Tar's.


Please note that the images featured above are © Maudlin Jack Tar.

Thursday 31 October 2024

Nugget 366

I hope to collect the latest issue of THE NUGGET from the printer (Macaulay Scott Printing Company of Welling, Kent) later this morning. Once I have and it has been put into stamped and addressed envelopes, I will post it out to members.

I have sent the PDF copy to the webmaster and members should soon be able to read this issue of THE NUGGET online in the very near future.


IMPORTANT: Please note that this is the third issue of THE NUGGET to be published for the 2024-2025 subscription year.

If you wish to subscribe for the 2024-2025 subscription year and have not yet done so, please request a PayPal invoice or the bank transfer information from the Treasurer or follow the instructions on the relevant page of the website.

Wednesday 30 October 2024

The nineteenth century South American naval arms race (Part 3): The Brazilian reaction

The Brazilians did not take part in this arms race but did ensure that a range of ships were ordered to maintain the strength of their navy in comparison to those of Chile and Argentina. In 1883 the Brazilian Navy comprised:

  • Bahia (Monitor) (1864 to 1894)
  • Brasil (Ironclad) (1864 to 1890)
  • Lima Barros (Ironclad) (1864 to 1905)
  • Maria e Barros (Armoured Corvette) (1864 to 1897)
  • Herval (Armoured Corvette) (1864 to 1885)
  • Para (Monitor) (1868 to 1884)
  • Rio Grande (Monitor) (1868 to 1907)
  • Alagoas (Monitor) (1868 to 1900)
  • Piaui (Monitor) (1868 to 1893)
  • Ceara (Monitor) (1868 to 1884)
  • Sete de Setembro (Armoured Frigate) (1868 to 1893)
  • Independencia (Turreted Ironclad): Ordered in 1873 and purchased by the Royal Navy in 1878 before she was delivered. Commissioned in 1883 as HMS Neptune. (1873 to 1903)
  • Alfonso Celso (Gunboat) (1881 to 1900)

Bahia

Brasil

Lima Barros

Maria e Barros

Herval

Para, Rio Grande, Alagoas, Piaui, and Ceara

Sete de Setembro

Independencia/HMS Neptune

Alfonso Celso

Between 1883 and 1901, the following ships were ordered for the Brazilian Navy:

  • Riachuelo (Turetted Ironclad) (1883 to 1910)
  • Aquidaba (Turetted Ironclad): Renamed Dezesseis de Abril in 1894 and Vinte e Quatro Maio that same year. Reverted to her original name in 1900. (1883 to 1906)
  • Almirante Tamandare (Protected Cruiser) (1885 to 1915)
  • Benjamin Constant (Training Ship/Protected Cruiser) (1891 to 1926)
  • Tiradentes (Torpedo Gunboat) (1891 to 1925)
  • Gustavo Sampaio (Torpedo Gunboat) (1891 to 1912)
  • Republica (Protected Cruiser) (1892 to 1920)
  • Almirante Barroso (Protected Cruiser) (1895 to 1931)
  • Tupi (Torpedo Gunboat) (1896 to 1915)
  • Timbera (Torpedo Gunboat) (1896 to 1917)
  • Amazonas (Protected  Cruiser): Sold incomplete in 1898 to the United States and commissioned as USS New Orleans. (1895 to ?)
  • Alimirante Abreu (Protected Cruiser): Sold incomplete in 1898 to the United States and commissioned as USS Albany. (1897 to ?)
  • Tamoio (Torpedo Gunboat) (1898 to 1920)
  • Marshal Deodoro (Coastal Defence Pre-Dreadnought): Sold to Mexico in 1924 and renamed Anahuac. (1898 to 1938)
  • Marshal Floriano (Coastal Defence Pre-Dreadnought) (1899 to 1936)

Riachuelo

Aquidaba

Almirante Tamandare

Benjamin Constant

Tiradentes

Gustavo Sampaio

Republica

Almirante Barroso

Tupi and Timbera

Amazonas/USS New Orleans

Alimirante Abreu/USS Albany

Tamoio

Marshal Deodoro

Marshal Floriano

Tuesday 29 October 2024

The nineteenth century South American naval arms race (Part 2): Chile vs Argentina (1883 to 1901)

Between 1883 and 1901 the Chileans and Argentinians ordered the following ships to add to their navies:

Chile

  • Capitán Prat (Ironclad Battleship) (1887 to 1942)
  • Presidente Errázuriz (Protected Cruiser) (1887 to ?)
  • Presidente Pinto (Protected Cruiser) (1887 to 1905)
  • Blanco Encalada (Protected Cruiser) (1892 to 1945)
  • Esmeralda (Armoured Cruiser) (1895 to 1930)
  • Ministro Zenteno (Protected Cruiser) (1895 to 1930)
  • O’Higgins (Armoured Cruiser) (1896 to 1946)
  • Chacabuco (Protected Cruiser) (1898 to 1959)
  • Constitución (Pre-dreadnought Battleship): Ordered in 1901 and purchased by the Royal Navy in 1903 and commissioned as HMS Swiftsure. (1901 to 1920)
  • Libertad (Pre-dreadnought Battleship): Ordered in 1901 and purchased by the Royal Navy in 1903 and commissioned as HMS Triumph. Sunk by U-21 during the Dardanelles Campaign. (1901 to 1915)

Capitán Prat

Presidente Errázuriz

Presidente Pinto

Blanco Encalada

Esmeralda

Ministro Zenteno

O’Higgins

Chacabuco

Constitución/HMS Swiftsure

Libertad/HMS Triumph

Argentina

  • Libertad (Coastal Defence Battleship) (1889 to 1968)
  • Independencia (Coastal Defence Battleship) (1889 to 1968)
  • Veinticinco de Mayo (Protected Cruiser) (1890 to 1921)
  • Nueve de Julio (Protected Cruiser) (1891 to 1930)
  • Buenos Aires (Protected Cruiser) (1894 to 1935)
  • Garibaldi (Armoured Cruiser) (1895 to 1936)
  • San Martin (Armoured Cruiser) (1896 to 1947)
  • Pueyrredón (Armoured Cruiser) (1897 to 1957)
  • General Belgrano (Armoured Cruiser) (1898 to 1953)
  • Rivadavia (Armoured Cruiser): Ordered in 1901 and sold in 1902 to Japan. Renamed Kasuga. Sunk as a result of an air attack by US Navy aircraft in 1945. (1901 to 1945)
  • Mariano Moreno (Armoured Cruiser): Ordered in 1901 and sold to Japan in 1902. Renamed Nisshin. Used as a target ship from 1935 onwards. Sunk in 1936, raised and sunk again in 1942. (1901 to 1942)

Libertad

Independencia

Veinticinco de Mayo

Nueve de Julio

Buenos Aires

Garibaldi

San Martin

Pueyrredón

General Belgrano

Rivadavia/Kasuga

Mariano Moreno/Nisshin