Pages

Showing posts with label Early 20th Century. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Early 20th Century. Show all posts

Wednesday, 20 May 2026

Soldiers of the Queen (SOTQ) Issue 194

The latest issue of the Victorian Military Society's SOTQ (Soldiers of the Queen) was delivered on Saturday, and I have spent some of the time since reading each of the articles in it.

The articles included in this issue are:

  • The Army and the Periodic Press by Prof Ian F W Beckett
  • A Soldier of the Queen and the Imperial Tour of India 1875-1876 by David Howell
  • Commissions by the Back Door by Dr Roger Salmon
  • 'Arithmetic on the Frontier' by John Sly
  • Book Reviews by Andy Smith
  • Obituary: Meurig Giles Morgan Jones by Dan Allen
  • Officers of the Victorian Military Society
  • Myth and Reality: Military Art in the Age of Queen Victoria Tuesday 1st July 2025 to Sunday 1st November 2026 at the National Army Museum.

Another excellent collection of articles, and it is very difficult to select a single one as being more interesting that another. That said, I can see myself returning to and re-reading both Professor Beckett's article about the Army and the press and Dr Salmon's article about the commissioning of officers via the back door.

The annual cost of membership of the Victorian Military Society is:

  • UK: £30.00
  • Overseas: £40.00 [except for Australia, New Zealand, and Singapore: £43.00])

My opinion remains that this magazine and the membership of the Victorian Military Society is well worth the cost of the annual subscription.

Tuesday, 24 March 2026

The Turkish battleship Feth-i Bülend and the Russian gunboat Vesta

The Feth-i Bülend was the name ship of a class of two Turkish ironclads built for the Ottoman Turkish navy between 1868 and 1874. The Feth-i Bülend was built by the Thames Ironworks and Shipbuilding Company Limited, whose shipyard was located at Leamouth Wharf (which was also known as Blackwall) at the confluence of Bow Creek and the River Thames in East London. She was laid down in May 1868, launched in 1869, and joined the Ottoman Turkish navy after sea trials in 1870.

A diagram showing the layout of the Turkish battleship Feth-i Bülend's armour and armament.

Her characteristics were:

  • Displacement: 2,718 tons
  • Dimensions:
    • Length: 72m (236ft 3in)
    • Beam: 11.9m (39ft 1in)
    • Draught: 5.2m (17ft 1in)
  • Propulsion: Six box boilers providing steam to a horizontal compound steam engine (3,250ihp) driving a single propellor
  • Speed: 13 knots
  • Complement: 16 officers and 153 sailors
  • Armament: 4 × 9-inch (229mm) Armstrong guns
  • Armour:
    • Belt: 150mm (6-inch) to 229mm (9-inch) iron armour
    • Casemate: 150mm (6-inch) to 229mm (9-inch) iron armour

The Turkish battleship Feth-i Bülend during her reconstruction in Armstrong-Ansaldo's shipyard in Genoa.

Despite being damaged during the Russo-Turkish War, she remained in service until 1924! She was inactive from 1880 to 1900, at which point she was reconstructed by Armstrong-Ansaldo in Genoa. She was reboilered and emerged with two water-tube boilers, which increased her speed very slightly. her armament was replaced by four 15cm (6-inch) SK L/40 guns which were mounted in the casemate, and six 75mm (3-inch) quick-firing guns and six 57mm (6-pounder) quick-firing guns on the upper deck.

She was disarmed during the Italo-Turkish War (1911-1912) and her guns were used to defend Salonika. She was then used as a barracks ship. During the First Balkan War, she remained at Salonika, and on the night of 31st October 1912, the Greek torpedo boat No.11 managed to sneak into the harbour, avoid detection, and launch three torpedoes at Feth-i Bülend. Two of the torpedoes hit the ship, and she capsized and sank with the loss of seven crew. The torpedo boat escaped undamaged.


Little is known about the Vesta other than she was a converted steam-powered wooden merchant ship that was armed with five 6-inch mortars and two 9-pounder guns and spa torpedoes. The latter were described in contemporary publications as lance torpedoes.

Sunday, 15 March 2026

The lyrics of the national anthem of the Soviet Union

I happened to be watching THE HUNT FOR RED OCTOBER, and was struck by the sound of the crew of the submarine singing the Soviet Union's national anthem as the ship's silent drive was engaged ... and realised that I had no idea what lyrics were!

The crew of the Red October singing the Soviet Union's national anthem as the silect drive is engaged.

I resolved to rectify that and found that there are several translations of the original Russian lyrics, including an official 1944 CPSU (Communist Party of the Soviet Union) version.

The original Russian words are:

Союз нерушимый республик свободных
Сплотила навеки Великая Русь.
Да здравствует созданный волей народов
Единый, могучий Советский Союз!

Славься, Отечество наше свободное,
Дружбы народов надёжный оплот!
Знамя советское, знамя народное
Пусть от победы к победе ведёт!

Сквозь грозы сияло нам солнце свободы,
И Ленин великий нам путь озарил:
Нас вырастил Сталин — на верность народу,
На труд и на подвиги нас вдохновил!

Славься, Отечество наше свободное,
Счастья народов надёжный оплот!
Знамя советское, знамя народное
Пусть от победы к победе ведёт!

Мы армию нашу растили в сраженьях.
Захватчиков подлых с дороги сметём!
Мы в битвах решаем судьбу поколений,
Мы к славе Отчизну свою поведём!

Славься, Отечество наше свободное,
Славы народов надёжный оплот!
Знамя советское, знамя народное
Пусть от победы к победе ведёт!

In Romanised script, it reads as follows:

Soyúz nerushímyy respúblik svobódnykh
Splotíla navéki velíkaya Rus.
Da zdrávstvuyet sózdannyy vóley naródov
Yedínyy, mogúchiy Sovétskiy Soyúz!

Slávsya, Otéchestvo náshe svobódnoye,
Drúzhby naródov nadyózhnyy oplót!
Známya sovétskoye, známya naródnoye
Pust ot pobédy k pobéde vedyót!

Skvoz grózy siyálo nam sólnce svobódy,
I Lénin velíkiy nam put ozaríl
Nas výrastil Stálin — na vérnost naródu,
Na trud i na pódvigi nas vdokhnovíl!

Slávsya, Otéchestvo náshe svobódnoye,
Schástia naródov nadyózhnyy oplót!
Známya sovétskoye, známya naródnoye
Pust ot pobédy k pobéde vedyót!

My ármiyu náshu rastíli v srazhéniakh.
Zakhvátchikov pódlykh s dorógi smetyóm!
My v bítvakh resháyem sudbú pokoléniy,
My k sláve Otchíznu svoyú povedyóm!

Slávsya, Otéchestvo náshe svobódnoye,
Slávy naródov nadyózhnyy oplót!
Známya sovétskoye, známya naródnoye
Pust ot pobédy k pobéde vedyót!

The 1944 official CPSU translation of the lyrics are as follows:

Unbreakable Union of freeborn Republics
Great Russia has welded forever to stand;
Created in struggle by will of the peoples,
United and mighty, our Soviet land!

Sing to our Motherland, glory undying,
Bulwark of peoples in brotherhood strong!
Flag of the Soviets, peoples' flag flying,
Lead us from victory to victory on!

Through tempests, the sunrays of freedom have cheered us,
Along the new path where great Lenin lead,
Be true to the people, thus Stalin has reared us,
Inspired us to labour and valorous deed!

Sing to our Motherland, glory undying,
Bulwark of peoples in brotherhood strong!
Flag of the Soviets, peoples' flag flying,
Lead us from victory to victory on!

Our army grew up in the heat of grim battle,
Barbarian invaders, we'll swiftly strike down.
In combat the fate of the future we'll settle,
Our country we'll lead to eternal renown!

Sing to our Motherland, glory undying,
Bulwark of peoples in brotherhood strong!
Flag of the Soviets, peoples' flag flying,
Lead us from victory to victory on!

The lyric were amended after the death of Stalin, and the line that reads 'Be true to the people, thus Stalin has reared us/i>' was changed to 'To a righteous cause, he raised the people'.

The flag of the Soviet Union.

Friday, 6 March 2026

I should not read other people's blog posts ...

I am waiting for the delivery of my final order from Irregular Miniatures before I can add a Russian-style nineteenth army to my Belle Époque project. In the interim, it was my intention to playtest the latest draft of my PORTABLE BELLE ÉPOQUE WARGAME rules with a Sahel Hadendowi vs. Oblele battle ... and then I read Tradgardmastare's THE DUCHY OF TRADGARDLAND blog.

The particular blog posts that engaged my attention were WONDERLAND OR THE JOY OF MODEL SHOPS, THE ARMY OF TRANSILVANIA, and OPPOSITION. These were about his recent purchase of a box of Strelets-R ROMANIAN INFANTRY figures ...

© Alan Gruber (AKA Tradgardmastare)

... and a box of their ITALIAN ARMY IN WINTER DRESS (STALINGRAD) figures.

© Alan Gruber (AKA Tradgardmastare)

He has painted up the former to be soldiers in the army of Transilvania – his early twentieth century imagi-nation – and the latter will be their opponents, the army of the Duchy of Volare Cantare.

Now, I have loads of painted 20mm World War II figures sitting in boxes in my toy/wargames room, I have a suitable set of simple rules already written, and I have enough Hexon II terrain to hand to fight a battle or two ... so why don't I use them?

It would be stupid not to ... wouldn't it?


I finished writing this blog post and had uploaded it for publication before I went looking for the figures I was going to use. It was at this point that I found a box of painted 15mm figures that Carl Luxford gave me back in October 2022.

Inside the box were a number of Askaris and European officers, native and Arab troops (including cavalry), and native bearers.

I got the figures out ... and immediately realised that I had to assimilate them into my Belle Époque collection tout suite!

As a result, I have put my plans to fight a battle with my 20mm figures on hold for the time being.

It would be stupid not to ... wouldn't it?

Friday, 30 January 2026

Edward Dicey: A Victorian and Edwardian writer and journalist

I have recently been reading Edward Dicey’s first-person narrative about the Schleswig-Holstein War of 1864 - which he observed a at close hand from both sides of the conflict - and as a result, I decided to find out more about him.

Edward Dicey was born on 15th May 1832 in Claybrook, Leicestershire. His father - Thomas Edward Dicey - was a senior wrangler in 1811, a railway pioneer in the Midlands, and owner of a Northampton newspaper, and his mother - Anne Mary - was the sister of Sir James Stephen - an abolitionist and the Under Secretary of State for the Colonies from 1836 to 1847.

He was educated at home before attending King’s College London for two years and then Trinity College Cambridge, where he obtained a 3rd-class BA and been President of the Cambridge Union for a year.

After university he began writing and travelling as well as developing an interest in international politics. From 1861 until 1870 he crossed and re-crossed the world, and visited and wrote about the early stages of the reunification of Italy, the American Civil War, the Schleswig-Holstein War, and the Austro-Prussian War. In 1862 he became a member of the staff of THE DAILY TELEGRAPH, and in 1870 he was editor of THE DAILY NEWS for three months. He then moved over to THE OBSERVER, where he was editor from 1870 until 1889.

In 1865 he entered Gray’s Inn and ten years later he was called to the Bar although he never practiced. That said, in later life he made his Chambers his home, and he became a Bencher in 1896 and Treasurer from 1903 to 1904. He died in Chambers on 7th July 1911.

His books reflected his travels and interests and included:

  • Rome in 1860 (1861
  • Cavour: A Memoir (1861)
  • Six Months in the Federal States (1863)
  • The Schleswig-Holstein War (1864)
  • The Battle-Fields of 1866 (1866)
  • A Month in Russia during the Marriage of the Czarevitch (1867)
  • The Morning Land, being Sketches of Turkey, the Holy Land, and Egypt (1870)
  • England and Egypt (1881
  • Victor Emmanuel (1882)
  • Bulgaria, the Peasant State (1894)
  •  The Story of the Khedivate (1902)
  • The Egypt of the Future (1907)

Tuesday, 9 December 2025

Britannia's Bluff: The ships

Back in September, I wrote a blog post that included images of some of the ships that were going to be featured in Antoine Vanner's forthcoming novel (BRITANNIA'S BLUFF), which was published recently.

The book includes illustrations of the most important ships featured in the book. These are shown below.

© Antoine Vanner

© Antoine Vanner

© Antoine Vanner

© Antoine Vanner

© Antoine Vanner

© Antoine Vanner

© Antoine Vanner

I am particularly pleased that Antoine Vanner has included a battleship (the Memduhiye) that is based on one of my favourite Turkish ships, the Mesudiye.

The Mesudiye (Turkish: Happiness) was built as a central-battery ironclad for the Ottoman Navy in the 1870s. She was ordered – along with a sister ship – from Thames Iron Works and delivered in December 1875. (Her sister ship – the Hamidieh – was compulsorily purchased by the British Government at the time of the Russian war scare of 1878 and completed as HMS Sultan.)

By the end of the nineteenth century, she was obsolete and poorly maintained, and in 1898 the Ottoman government decided to have her reconstructed by the Gio. Ansaldo & C. shipyard in Genoa. When she returned to service in 1904, she was a coastal defence pre-dreadnought battleship.

Her characteristics when built were:

  • Displacement: 8,797 tons
  • Dimensions:
    • Length: 101.02m (331ft 5in)
    • Beam: 17.98m (59.0ft)
    • Draught: 7.9m (25ft 11in)
  • Propulsion: 8 x box boilers producing steam to power 1 x 7,431 ihp compound steam engine driving a single propeller
  • Speed: 13.7 knots
  • Complement: 700
  • Armament: 12 × 10-inch RML guns; 3 × 7-inch RML guns
  • Armour: Belt: 305mm (12-inches); Battery: 254mm (10-inches)

Her characteristics after being reconstructed were:

  • Displacement: 8,980 tons
  • Dimensions:
    • Length: 101.02m (331ft 5in)
    • Beam: 17.98m (59.0ft)
    • Draught: 7.9m (25ft 11in)
  • Propulsion: 16 x Niclausse boilers producing steam to power 2 x 5,500 ihp triple-expansion steam engines, each driving a propeller
  • Speed: 17 knots
  • Complement: 800
  • Armament: 2 × 9.2-inch Vickers A guns (Not fitted); 12 × 5.9-inch Vickers D QF guns; 16 x 3-inch Vickers N QF guns; 10 x 57mm Hotchkiss QF guns; 2 x 47mm Hotchkiss QF guns
  • Armour: Belt: 305mm (12-inches); Battery: 254mm (10-inches)

The Mesudiye.

Sunday, 7 December 2025

Britannia's Bluff: The newest addition to the Dawlish Chronicles

The latest addition to Antoine Vanner's DAWLISH CHRONICLES was published yesterday ... just in time for Christmas! I have already bought my copy and hope to read it over Christmas ... if I can put to one side the temptation of reading it at once!

The latest book deals with the Gallipoli campaign, and sees the retired Admiral Sir Nicholas Dawlish recalled to service in order mount an operation that will divert Turkish attention from the forthcoming evacuation so that it can be carried out with the minimum casualties. As the book's blurb on Amazon states, this will involve 'a colossal bluff. Drawing on his half century’s experience of conflict, guile, new technology and outright daring, he plans a lightning diversionary campaign at sea, on land and by air. Speed and surprise will be the deciding factors.'

As I have commented before, the thing that marks out Antoine Vanner's work is the level of background research he does into the history, politics, and technological developments of the era he is writing about, and for that reason alone his books are worth reading.


The thirteen books in the series that have been published to date are (in chronological order):

  • BRITANNIA’S INNOCENT: THE DALISH CHRONICLES: FEBRUARY 1864 – MAY 1864
  • BRITANNIA’S INTERESTS: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: JULY 1866 – NOVEMBER 1866
  • BRITANNIA’S GUILE: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: JANUARY 1877 – AUGUST 1877
  • BRITANNIA'S WOLF: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: SEPTEMBER 1877 – FEBRUARY 1878
  • BRITANNIA'S REACH: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: NOVEMBER 1879 – APRIL 1880
  • BRITANNIA'S SHARK: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: APRIL 1881 – SEPTEMBER 1881
  • BRITANNIA'S SPARTAN: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: JUNE 1859 AND APRIL 1882 – AUGUST 1882
  • BRITANNIA'S AMAZON: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: APRIL 1882 – AUGUST 1882
  • BRITANNIA'S MISSION: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: AUGUST 1883 – FEBRUARY 1884
  • BRITANNIA'S GAMBLE: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: MARCH 1884 – FEBRUARY 1885
  • BRITANNIA’S MORASS: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: SEPTEMBER 1884 – DECEMBER 1884
  • BRITANNIA’S RULE: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: SEPTEMBER 1886 – APRIL 1888
  • BRITANNIA’S BLUFF: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: NOVEMBER 1915 – JANUARY 1916


BRITANNIA’S BLUFF: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: NOVEMBER 1915 – JANUARY 1916 was written by Antoine Vanner and published in 2025 by Old Salt Press (ISBN 9781 943 40470 4) and can be purchased via Amazon in paperback or Kindle editions.

Friday, 3 October 2025

The 'thirty-knotter' turtle-back destroyers

These were not a homogeneous class of torpedo boat destroyers. They were built from 1895 onward to designs produced by the shipyards that built them to match guidelines laid down by the Admiralty. By 1913 the Royal Navy had split them into three 'classes':

  • B-class (the ships with four funnels): 24 ships (22 served during the First World War)
  • C-class (the ships with three funnels): 40 ships (36 served during the First World War)
  • D-class (the ships with two funnels): 10 ships (8 served during the First World War)

By the outbreak of the First World War, although the surviving ships were obsolete and unfit for front-line service, they performed many useful tasks such a patrolling and escorting convoys, and several were lost as a result on enemy action.

  • HMS Recruit was torpedoed and sunk by U-boat UB-6 on 1st May 1915.
  • HMS Coquette sank on 7th March 1916 after a hitting a mine laid by U-boat UC-10.
  • HMS Flirt was torpedoed and sunk by German destroyers on 27th October 1916.
  • HMS Cheerful was mined and sunk on 30th June 1917.
  • HMS Fairy sank after ramming U-boat UC-75 on 31st May 1918.

HMS Lively (B-class built by Laird, Birkenhead).
HMS Arab (C-class built by J & G Thomson, Clydebank).
HMS Fame (D-class built by Thornycroft, Chiswick)​,

The main characteristics of the '30-knotters' were:

  • Displacement: 350 to 445 tons
  • Dimensions:
    • Length: 209ft (64m) to 215ft (55m)
    • Beam: ?
    • Draught: ?
  • Propulsion: 2 x Triple expansion steam engines or steam turbines
  • Speed: 30 to 36.5 knots
  • Complement: 63 to 69
  • Armament: 1 x 12-pounder QF gun; 5 x 6-pounder QF guns; 2 x 18-inch (450mm) torpedo tubes

Thursday, 2 October 2025

The Astraea-class second-class protected cruisers

The eight ships of the Astraea-class of second-class protected cruisers were built for the Royal Navy in the period after the passing of the Naval Defence Act (1889). During their service, they operated across the world and served on foreign stations in the Indian and Pacific Oceans and off the coast of South Africa.

HMS Astraea.

By the outbreak of the First World War, the class was obsolete (one had even been sold for scrapping) but the survivors continued in service with the Royal Navy in a number of secondary roles, including acting a training and depot ships. With the exception of one of the class (HMS Hermione), they were all sold and scrapped soon after the end of the war.

The class's characteristics were:

  • Displacement: 4,360 tons
  • Dimensions:
    • Length:  320ft (97.5m)
    • Beam: 49ft 6in (15.09m)
    • Draught: 19ft (5.8m)
  • Propulsion:  8 x cylinder boilers providing steam to 2 x 3-cylinder vertical triple expansion engines (7,500 hp) each connected to a shaft driving a propeller
  • Speed:  18 knots (19.5 knots with forced draught)
  • Range:  7,000 nautical miles at 10 knots
  • Complement: 318
  • Armament 2 x 6-inch (152mm) QF guns; 8 x 4.7-inch (120mm) QF guns 10 x 6-pounder (57mm) QF guns; 1 x 3-pounder (47mm) QF guns; 4 x 18-inch (450mm) torpedo tubes
  • Armour: 
    • Deck: 2 inches (50mm)
    • Engine hatch: 5 inches (130mm)
    • Gun shields: 4.5 inches (110mm)
    • Conning tower: 6 to 3 inches (152mm to 76mm)

There were eight ships on the class:

  • Astraea: Laid down: August 1890; Launched: 17th March 1893; Completed: 5th November 1895; Sold: 1st July 1920
  • Bonaventure: Laid down: December 1890; Launched: 2nd December 1892; Completed: 5th July 1894; May 1906 to April 1907: Converted into a submarine depot ship; Sold: 12th July 1920
  • Cambrian: Laid down: 1891; Launched: 30th January 1893; Completed: March 1916; Renamed HMS Harlech and converted into a base ship; Renamed HMS Vivid in September 1921; Sold: February 1923
  • Charybdis:Laid down: 1891; Launched: 15th June 1893; Completed: 14th January 1896; Sold: 1922
  • Flora: Laid down ; ?; Launched: 21st November 1893; Completed: ?; 1914: Paid off and retained for harbour service; April 1915: Renamed Indus II and used as a training ship; Sold: 12th December 1922
  • Forte: Laid down:?; Launched: 9th December 1893; Completed: 5th November 1895; 1913: Paid off for disposal; Sold: 2nd April 1914
  • Fox: Laid down: ?; Launched: 15th June 1893; Completed: 14th April 1896; Sold: 1920
  • Hermione: Laid down: December 1891; Launched: 7th November 1893; Completed: 14th January 1896; December 1916: Became HQ ship for coastal forces; Sold: October 1921 to the Marine Society and renamed Warspite; Sold: September 1940

Tuesday, 30 September 2025

The Edgar-class first-class protected cruisers

Having recently written a blog post about Antoine Vanner's next book in the Dawlish Chronicles series, I decided to take a closer look at the classes of British ships mentioned in the book.


The Edgar-class were a group of nine first-class protected cruisers that were built for the Royal Navy in the late nineteenth century.

On 30th May 1889, the Naval Defence Act received royal assent. As a result, the 'two-power standard' (i.e. the Royal Navy to be as strong as the combined strength of the world's next two largest navies ... which in 1889 meant the French and Russian Navies) was formally adopted as a central tenet of British naval policy, and this led to a large number of new ships being ordered to increase Britain's naval strength.

HMS Edgar.

The Edgar-class was one of the classes that were ordered as a direct result of this Act, and they served until they were scrapped in the 1920s.

The class's characteristics were:

  • Displacement: 7,700 tons
  • Dimensions:
    • Length: 387ft 6in (118.11m)
    • Beam: 60ft (18.3m)
    • Draught: 24ft (7.3m)
  • Propulsion: 4 x double-ended boilers providing steam to 2 x three-cylinder reciprocating triple expansion engines (12,000ihp) each connected to a shaft driving a propeller
  • Speed: 20 knots
  • Range: 10,000 nautical miles at 10 knots
  • Complement: 544
  • Armament: 2 x 9.2-inch (230mm) Mk VI BL guns; 10 x 6-inch (152mm) QF guns; 12 x 6-pounder (57mm) QF guns; 4 x 18-inch (450mm) torpedo tubes
  • Armour:
    • Deck: 5 to 3 inches (127mm to 76mm)
    • Casemate: 6 inches (152mm)
    • Gun shields (9.2-inch guns): 3 inches (76mm)
    • Conning tower: 10 inches (254mm)

There were nine ships in the class:

  • Edgar: Laid down: 3rd June 1889; Launched: 24th November 1890; Commissioned: 2nd March 1893; Sold 9th May 1921
  • Hawke: Laid down: 16th June 1889; Launched: 11th March 1891; Commissioned: 16th May 1893; Sunk by a torpedo fired by the German U-9: 15th October 1914
  • Endymion: Laid down: 22nd November 1889; Launched: 22nd July 1891; Commissioned: 26th May 1894; Sold 16th March 1920
  • Royal Arthur (laid down as Centaur): Laid down: 20th January 1890; Launched: 26th February 1891; Commissioned: 2nd March 1893; Sold: August 1921
  • Gibraltar: Laid down: 2nd December 1889; Launched: 27th April 1892; Commissioned: 1st November 1894; Sold: August 1923
  • Grafton: Laid down: 1st January 1890; Launched: 30th January 1892; Commissioned: 18th October 1894; Sold: 1st July 1921
  • St George: Laid down: 23rd April 1890; Launched: 23rd June 1892; Commissioned: 25th October 1894; Sold: 1st July 1921
  • Theseus: Laid down: 16th July 1890; Launched: 8th September 1892; Commissioned: 14th January 1894; Scrapped: 1921
  • Crescent: Laid down: 13th October 1890; Launched: 30th March 1892; Commissioned: 22nd February 1894; Sold: 21st September 1921

These ship provided valuable service during the First World War despite being obsolete by 1914.

Monday, 29 September 2025

The next novel in the Dawlish Chronicles series will be out in December

I have been a fan of Antoine Vanner's novels about Nicholas Dawlish - a later nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Royal Navy officer- since the first was published back in 2013. Since then he has published a new novel every year in the run up to Christmas.

Antoine has recently announced that the next book - the thirteenth in the series - will be published in December, but he has not yet disclosed the titled. However, he has made it known that the following (imaginary) British warships will be featured:

© Antoine Vanner.

© Antoine Vanner.

© Antoine Vanner.

This looks like it is going to be yet another great read, and I highly recommend this series of books to anyone with an interest in the exploits of the Royal Navy during the second half of the nineteenth century and the early years of the twentieth century.


The twelve books in the series that have been published to date are (in chronological order):

  • BRITANNIA’S INNOCENT: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: FEBRUARY 1864 – MAY 1864
  • BRITANNIA’S INTERESTS: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: JULY 1866 – NOVEMBER 1866
  • BRITANNIA’S GUILE: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: JANUARY 1877 – AUGUST 1877
  • BRITANNIA'S WOLF: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: SEPTEMBER 1877 – FEBRUARY 1878
  • BRITANNIA'S REACH: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: NOVEMBER 1879 – APRIL 1880
  • BRITANNIA'S SHARK: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: APRIL 1881 – SEPTEMBER 1881
  • BRITANNIA'S SPARTAN: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: JUNE 1859 AND APRIL 1882 – AUGUST 1882
  • BRITANNIA'S AMAZON: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: APRIL 1882 – AUGUST 1882
  • BRITANNIA'S MISSION: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: AUGUST 1883 – FEBRUARY 1884
  • BRITANNIA'S GAMBLE: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: MARCH 1884 – FEBRUARY 1885
  • BRITANNIA’S MORASS: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: SEPTEMBER 1884 – DECEMBER 1884
  • BRITANNIA’S RULE: THE DAWLISH CHRONICLES: SEPTEMBER 1886 – APRIL 1888

Sunday, 28 September 2025

The Spanish Civil War and Woolwich: Possible YouTube videos?

Back in May, I gave a talk to the Monday Get Together group at Shrewsbury House, our local community centre. It was about THE SPANISH CIVIL WAR AND WOOLWICH and it lasted about an hour.

I have been thinking about turning the PowerPoint presentation into a series of short videos to add my WARGAMING MISCELLANY YouTube channel. This should not be too difficult to do as I can fit in making the videos as and when I have the time.

If I do create these videos and upload them to my YouTube channel, I’ll publish relevant blog posts.

Friday, 15 August 2025

Victory over Japan Day (V-J Day): Eighty years on

Today marks the eightieth anniversary of Victory over Japan Day (VJ-Day). On this day, it seems appropriate to remember the epitaph that is carved on the memorial of the 2nd British Division in the cemetery at Kohima:

When you go home, tell them of us and say,
For your tomorrow, we gave our today.


John Maxwell Edmonds (21st January 1875 – 18th March 1958) was an English classicist, poet and dramatist and is credited with writing this epitaph in 1918. It was inspired by an epigram written by the Greek poet Simonides of Ceos to the fallen at the Battle of Thermopylae:

Tell them in Lacedaemon, passer-by
That here, obedient to their word, we lie.

Saturday, 31 May 2025

The 109th anniversary of the Battle of Jutland … and some wonderful wargaming memories

Today marks the 109th anniversary of the initial stages of the biggest naval battle of the Great War, the Battle of Jutland.

Map showing the course of the Battle of Jutland.

Over the years, many naval wargamers have re-fought this crucial battles, and I took part in two such wargames. The first – which was staged the the US Naval War College in the Queen’s House at the National Maritime Museum in Greenwich – was in November 2018, and the second staged by the Jockey’s Fields Irregulars in Holborn, London in December 2021.

The former used rules written by the staff of the US Naval War College in 1922 in light of the experience gained and data gathered during the Great War, ...

An example of the individual ship record cards used in the US Naval War College's 1922 Naval War Game.

... and the latter used a simplified, fast-play version of Fletcher Pratt's Naval War Game. Both used 1:1200th-scale model ships ... and the sight of so many model ships was stunning!

The final positions of the British and German fleets at the end of the Jockey's Fields re-fight of the Battle of Jutland..

Now that I can no longer crawl about on the floor, I doubt if I’ll ever be able to take part in such large naval wargames in the future … but I have some wonderful memories of those two wargames!

Tuesday, 27 May 2025

The sinking of the Bismarck

On 27th May 1941, the German battleship Bismarck was sunk by units of the Royal Navy.

Bismarck.
Prinz Eugen.

She had left Germany in the company of the heavy cruiser Prinz Eugen on 19th May, and after sailing through the Kattegat (where she was spotted by the Swedish cruiser HSwMS Gotland) and reached Norwegian waters on the following evening. By midday on 21st May, Bismarck and Prinz Eugen and a small flotilla of destroyers reached Bergen and anchored in Grimstadfjord.

HSwMS Gotland.

At 7.30pm on 21st May, Bismarck, Prinz Eugen, and the three escorting destroyers left Bergen, The destroyers part company with the battleship and the cruiser at not long after 4.00am on 22st May, and at midday the Bismarck and the Prinz Eugen turned towards the Denmark Strait and thence into the North Atlantic.

By this time the British Home Fleet were aware that the two German ships had left Norway and units had begun to deploy to intercept them.

At 7.22pm on 23rd May, the German warships detected the cruiser HMS Suffolk at a range of approximately 12,500 m (13,700 yd). HMS Suffolk was joined by HMS Norfolk at 8.30pm, and the pair of cruisers shadowed the German ships using their radar equipment.

HMS Suffolk.
HMS Norfolk.

At 05.45am on 24th May, the Germans spotted the smoke of the fast aproching HMS Hood and HMS Prince of Wales on the horizon, and at 5.52am HMS Hood opened fire on Prinz Eugen. HMS Prince of Wales opened fire a minute or so later, and by soon afterwards the two German ships began to return fire.

Eight minutes after opening fire, HMS Hood was hit by several heavy shells, exploded, and sank. The Bismarck switched her fire to HMS Prince of Wales and immediately hit the ship's bridge. This, coupled with a serious problems with the ship's main armament that reduced her to a broadside of five rather than ten 14-inch guns, caused her captain to turn away and break off the action. She then joined the two British cruisers who continued to shadow the German warships.

After ascertaining the extent of damaged caused by the British three shells that had hit Bismarck, Admiral Lütjens, who was in command of the two German ships, ordered the Prinz Eugen to sail towards France, which she did at 6.14pm during a squall.(One shell had hit the forward part of the Bismarck causing approximately 2,000 tons of water to flood into the ship, contaminating fuel oil stored in the bow tanks and flooding in one of the boiler room).

Bismarck then turned towards the shadowing British ships, and HMS Prince of Wales fired twelve salvos at the Bismarck, which returned fire. Neither side scored any hits. The Bismarck then resumed her previous course and the three British ships continued to shadow her from a distance.

At 10:00pm, the recently commissioned HMS Victorious launched an attack on the Bismarck by nine Fairey Swordfish torpedo bombers. Of the eight torpedoes they launched, only one hit the Bismarck, and it caused minor damage amidships. However, the violent manoeuvres Bismarck undertook to avoid the torpedoes increased the flooding in the forward part of the ship and resulted in the loss of a second boiler room. This caused Bismarck to reduce speed to 16 knots until repairs could be completed. She was then able to increase speed to 20 knots.

HMS Victorius.

Admiral Lütjens now decided that Bismarck should set course for France. At 03.00am on 25th May Lütjens ordered an increase in speed and for Bismarck to turn to the west and then northwards. As a result of the manoeuvre, Bismarck caused the shadowing British ships to lose contact.

The German admiral then sent a long radio signal to Naval Group West headquarters in Paris. This enabled the British signal interception service to take bearings that provided an up-to-date position of the German battleship. Unfortunately, this was misplotted on HMS King George V (which was leading the search for the Bismarck) and it was not until an RAF Consolidated Catalina flying boat spotted her at 10.30am on 26th May that the Bismarck's accurate position and course were known to her pursuers.

HMS Ark Royal.
HMS Sheffield.

HMS Ark Royal, which was part of Force H, mounted an torpedo bomber attack on Bismarck. The Fairey Swordfish aircraft mistakenly attacked HMS Sheffield ... and discovered that the magnetic detonators fitted to their torpedoes were faulty. The aircraft returned to HMS Ark Royal, rearmed with torpedoes fitted with conventional contact detonators and made a second attack on the German battleship. At 8.47pm, the Swordfish began their attack, and despite undertaking violent manoeuvres and firing at the aircraft with every available gun, two torpedoes hit the Bismarck.

One torpedoe hit her amidships on the port side, just under the main armour belt. This caused minor damage and some flooding. The second torpedo also hit Bismarck on the port side near the stern and close to the port rudder shaft. More importantly, the port rudder assembly was badly damaged by this torpedo hit and jammed the rudder at an angle of 12° to port. This caused her to steer in a very large circle.

The Bismarck was now unable to escape her pursuers. HMS Sheffield, which was now in visual range of the Bismarck, was driven off by several salvoes of 15-inch shells. Her shadowing role was now taken on by five destroyers that were under the command of Captain Philip Vian. They intercepted the German battleship at 10.38pm on 26th May.

During the night of 26th/27th May, the destroyers mounted several torpedo attacks on the Bismarck, none of which were successful. Just after daybreak on 27th May, HMS King George V and HMS Rodney came in to view and at 8.47am the latter opened fire on the Bismarck at a range of approximately 25,000 yards (23,000 m).

HMS Rodney.
HMS King George V.

Moments later, HMS King George V also opened fire, and at 8.50am the Bismarck began firing at HMS Rodney. As the range reduced, the British heavy cruisers HMS Norfolk and HMS Dorsetshire began firing salvoes of 5-inch shells at the Bismarck and at 09.02am, one of HMS Rodney's 16-inch shells hit the Bismarck's forward superstructure, killing hundreds of men (probably including Admiral Lütjens and Bismarck's captain, Captain Lindemann) and seriously damaging the battleship's two forward turrets (Anton and Bruno).

Bismarck's forward turrets ceased firing at 9.27am, and by 9.31am her rear turrets (Caesar and Dora) were also no longer firing. At 9.30am, the Bismarck's executive officer Fregattenkapitän Hans Oels ordered:

  • Any crew remaining below decks to abandon ship.
  • The opening of the ship's watertight doors to enable crew to escape quickly and to assist in the scuttling of the ship.
  • The preparation of the ship's scuttling charges.

At around 10.20am the ship's chief engineering officer (Gerhard Junack) set of the scuttling charges, by which time the British battleships were firing at the helpless Bismarck at a range of approximately 3,000 yards (2,700 m). At the same time, HMS Dorsetshire was ordered to close in and torpedo Bismarck. She fired three, two on the target's port side and one on the starboard side ... and by 10.40am Bismarck had sunk.

HMS Dorsetshire.

Only 114 of Bismarck's crew of over 2,200 men survived.

Tuesday, 20 May 2025

My first ever wargame article

I happened to be looking through my file of clippings when I came across a copy of the first ever wargame article that I wrote. It was published in issue No. 175 of the WARGAMER'S NEWSLETTER in October 1976, and was entitled BATTLE REPORT: THE BATTLE OF TAIPING ... and was a battle report about solo wargame set during the Sino-Japanese War.

I have reproduced this article below.


BATTLE REPORT

The Battle of Taiping

Preamble: This battle came about as a result of reading several books about the Sino-Japanese War. I possess a small Japanese Army based upon the Fujmi Japanese Infantry set and a First World War British Army suitable for use as Chinese Army units, and therefore set up the following battle. It was fought solo using my own rules which are based upon ideas by Featherstone, Sandars, Wise, and Grant. I also tried out a new idea of my own regarding major tactical decisions to remove bias in my decisions. When a major tactical decision had to be made, I wrote down 6 alternatives courses of action. I then threw a die and the number on the die was the course of action chosen.

Scenario: Several small Japanese units have been fired upon, and the local Japanese commander has decided to take punitive action against Chinese units in and around the village of Hanlow. In order to do this he has sent the following forces to Taiping, just north of Hanlow -

  • 1st, 2nd, 3rd, Infantry Coys.
  • A Mortar section.
  • A Machine gun section.
  • 3 Infantry guns.

The Chinese forces in and around Hanlow are as follows -

  • A, B, C, D, E and F Infantry Coys camped in the village.
  • An artillery battery (3 18pdrs) by the line of trees to the east of the village.
  • Sentries are at the railway bridge over the river and at the railway crossing.

Terrain: The terrain is a flat plain split be a railway embankment, which has paddy-fields to the north and south of it. A river (the River Tai) runs from north-east to south-west across the north-west corner of the plain.

The Battle: During the night, the 1st Japanese Company advance along the east bank of the river, whilst the 2nd and 3rd Companies, with the M.G. and Mortar sections moved towards the railway embankment along the Hanlow-Taiping road. The Chinese sentries were more alert than expected and were able to give a warning before being killed. The Japanese forces at the railway embankment now spead out along it, with the M.G. and Mortar sections sited to cover the road from Hanlow. The 1st Company continued its advance along the river bank after leaving a small force to cover the railway bridge.

The Chinese commander, on hearing the sentries' warnings, immediately alerted his men and dispatched A and B Companies towards the railway embankment, along the road. The Japanese held their fire until the Chinese were almost upon them, and then opened fire with all available weapons (rifles, light and heavy machine guns, 'knee' mortars, and 81mm mortars). The Chinese, who were becoming more and more visible in the growing light of dawn, now retreated to the paddy-fields after suffering heavy casualties.

In the meantime the 1st Company advanced further along the river bank and began to move into the southernmost paddy-fields. The Chinese C, D, E and F Companies now deployed towards those same paddy-fields, although unaware of the Japanese presence there. The Chinese battery opened fire on the embankment from their gun line near the trees, but only caused a few casualties on the well spread out Japanese forces there. They did, however, alert the Japanese commander to their presence, and he moved his infantry guns forward and formed a gun line to the rear of the embankment.

Using the paddy-fields as cover, A and B Companies had begun firing upon the embankment to cover the other companies as they advanced on the bridge. However, these four companies blundered into the Japanese 1st Company as it was deploying in the next field. The Japanese company commander did not hesitate in his actions and charged the Chinese, who, although superior in numbers, were shocked by the sudden appearance of the enemy on their flank. In the ensuing melee both sides suffered casualties but the ferocity of the Japanese attack had its desired effect, and the Chinese retreated towards Hanlow. The Japanese company commander, realising that the Chinese were only temporarily demoralised, and that he was considerably outnumbered, withdrew towards the river in order to make good an escape back to his own lines.

The Japanese infantry guns had, by now, moved into position and begun firing upon the Chinese gun line, who were still trying (in vain) to dislodge the Japanese on the embankment. The Japanese guns were, however, very effective, and within short time, had caused several casualties amongst the Chinese gunners. The Chinese now switched their attention to counter-battery fire, but without any observation their fire remained ineffective and wide of the target.

The Chinese commander now reviewed his situation. His artillery was not being very successful (especially in view of mounting casualties to the gunners) and although A and B Companies were in contact with the enemy, C, D, E and F Companies wee shaken after the skirmish in the paddy-fields He was also aware of a Japanese force on his flank (although unaware that this force was, in fact, retreating). He therefore decided that withdrawal was the best course he could take, and issued orders to the artillery to cease fire and move southwards with C, D, E and F Companies. He also ordered A and B Companies to slowly withdraw southward to cover the retreat. The Japanese 2nd and 3rd Companies , seeing this retreat, began to advance down the Hanlow-Taiping road, but were checked by A and B Companies long enough for the main Chinese force to withdraw, although the infantry guns were able to inflict some casualties upon the retreating force. When the Chinese finally withdrew off the battlefield the Japanese advanced and occupied Hanlow.

Conclusions and observations: The Japanese attack was not as successful as it should have been. The main advance down the Hanlow-Taiping road stalled as soon as the sentries alerted the main Chinese force. The flank attack also failed in its main purpose because of the size of the attacking force.

The Chinese counter-attack failed for two main reasons. Firstly the artillery support was bad as lack of observation made it impossible to adjust ranges, etc. Secondly the lack of reconnaissance by C, D, E and F Companies when advancing towards the railway bridge across the paddy-fields.

The battle was very enjoyable, and the new idea I tried out with regard to major tactical decisions worked quite well. An example of how well it did work is in the reaction of the main Japanese force when the Chinese sentries managed to give the alarm. I gave the commander the following 6 alternatives and then threw the die -

  1. Withdraw to Taiping.
  2. Leave a company to guard the crossing and send the rest of the troops towards the river.
  3. Leave a company to guard the crossing and advance wit the remainder.
  4. Stay put and defend the embankment.
  5. Continue the advance.
  6. Using the embankment as cover move the entire force toward the river.

The die score was 4 and this was the course of action which was followed.

By using such a system it is possible to have forces reacting to situations without bias on the part of the solo player, as long as he keeps the alternative options reasonable. I am going to use this system again in solo games as I found that it made this one more enjoyable than my usual games have been. If you are a solo player you might like to try it. Please do - you might find that it works as well for you as it did for me!


This was the first of several articles that I submitted to the WARGAMER'S NEWSLETTER and when the latter ceased publication, it directly led to an invitation from the late Dr Paddy Griffith to attend the famous Moor Park 'New Directions in Wargaming' Conference (the first ever Conference of Wargamers or COW). By the end of that conference I had suggested the name of the new organisation we created (WARGAME DEVELOPMENTS) and become the Treasurer and Memberships Secretary ... a role that I still perform some forty-five years later!

Monday, 19 May 2025

The Spanish Civil War and Woolwich

This morning, I have been invited to give a talk to the Monday Get Together group at Shrewsbury House, our local community centre. The group is made up of mainly retired people, and it has a varied programme of events that include historical talks, yoga, exercise for those with mobility problems, meeting with local councillors, financial and legal advice etc.

My talk is entitled THE SPANISH CIVIL WAR AND WOOLWICH and is split into two parts ... mainly to enable the audience to have a comfort and coffee break in the middle of the ninety-minute session.

The first half of the talks covers:

  • The rise and fall of the Spanish Empire.
  • A 'new' empire in Morocco and the creation of the Army of Africa.
  • Five myths about the Spanish Civil War.
  • The immediate causes of the Spanish Civil War.
  • The leaders of the coup.
  • Getting Franco to Morocco.
  • A brief history of the war.

The second half of the talks covers:

  • Woolwich in 1936.
  • Milk for Spain and the roles played by the Royal Arsenal Co-operative Society.
  • Children's homes for refugees and the Basque children's colony in Abbey Wood.
  • Save Democratic Spain.
  • People associated with Woolwich and their role in the Spanish Civil War:
    • Jim Ruskin.
    • Jock Mckissock.
    • Kenneth Bond.
    • Brian Griffin.
    • Phillip Hunter.
    • Captain Hugh Pollard.

If the talk – which is accompanied by a PowerPoint presentation – goes well. I may well turn it into a couple of YouTube videos.

Thursday, 15 May 2025

The Battle of Néry

Having read Professor Gary Sheffield’s recent battle report, I decided to find out more about this small but significant early Great War battle.

The Battle of Néry was fought on 1st September 1914 during the from Mons. The British 1st Cavalry Brigade were in the process of leaving their overnight bivouac when they were attacked by the German 4th Cavalry Division.

The British 1st Cavalry Brigade (commanded by Brigadier-General Charles James Briggs) comprised the following units:

  • 2nd Dragoon Guards (Queen's Bays)
  • 5th (Princess Charlotte of Wales's) Dragoon Guards
  • 11th (Prince Albert's Own) Hussars
  • 1st Signal Troop, Royal Engineers
  • L Battery, Royal Horse Artillery (6 x 13-pounder guns)
  • 1st Cavalry Brigade Machine Gun Squadron Machine Gun Corps

The German 4th Cavalry Division (commanded by General Otto Wladislaus Eduard Konstantin von Garnier) comprised the following units:

  • 3rd Cavalry Brigade
    • 2nd (Pomeranian) Cuirassiers Queen
    • 9th (2nd Pomeranian) Uhlans
  • 17th Cavalry Brigade
    • 17th (1st Grand Ducal Mecklenburgian) Dragoons
    • 18th (2ndGrand Ducal Mecklenburgian) Dragoons
  • 18th Cavalry Brigade
    • 15th (Hannover) Hussars Queen Wilhelmina of the Netherlands
    • 16th (Schleswig-Holstein) Hussars Emperor Francis Joseph of Austria, King of Hungary
  • Horse Artillery Abteilung of the 3rd (1st Brandenburg) Field Artillery General-Feldzeugmeister Regiment
  • 2nd Guards Machine Gun Detachment
  • Pioneer Detachment
  • Signals Detachment
  • Heavy Wireless Station
    • 18 Heavy Wireless Station
    • 19 Light Wireless Station
    • 10 Light Wireless Station
  • 12 Cavalry Motorised Vehicle Column

The Germans unknowingly approached the British position through the early morning fog and were spotted at 5.25am by a patrol of the 15th Hussars. Fighting started fifteen minutes later when the advanced units of the German division were engaged by British machine guns and horse artillery. In response, the German commander ordered his troops to dismount and make an assault on the village of Néry.

During the battle, most of the cavalry fought dismounted. All but one of L Battery, Royal Horse Artillery's guns were knocked out early during the fighting, but the remaining one stayed in action for two and a half hours and engaged the German Horse Artillery. (The gun is now on display at the Imperial War Museum, Lambeth, London.) Three of that gun's crew (Captain Edward Kinder Bradbury, Battery Sergeant Major George Thomas Dorrell, and Sergeant David Nelson) were awarded the Victoria Cross for their actions during the battle and the battery was subsequently awarded the honorific title 'Néry'.

The last gun of L Battery, Royal House Artillery in action at Néry.

British reinforcements (the 4th Cavalry Brigade – which comprised Household Cavalry Composite Regiment, 6th Dragoon Guards (Carabiniers), and 3rd (King's Own) Hussars – with I Battery, Royal Horse Artillery, and 1st Battalion, Middlesex Regiment) arrived at around 8:00am and counter-attacked the Germans. This forced the Germans to retreat and the German 4th Cavalry Division was unfit to return to combat for several days.


The Victoria Cross recipients were:

  • Captain Edward Kinder Bradbury (16th August 1881 – 1st September 1914) was given the award posthumously.
  • Battery Sergeant Major George Thomas Dorrell (7th July 1880 – 7th January 1971) rose to the rank of brevet Lieutenant-Colonel.
  • Sergeant David Nelson (3rd April 1887 – 8th April 1918) rose to the rank of Major by the time he was killed in action at Lillers, France.


L (Néry) Battery was formed in India in 1809 as 3rd Troop, Bengal Horse Artillery. It served with distinction during the Indian Mutiny, and Gunner William Connolly (c. 1816 – 31st December 1891) was awarded a Victoria Cross on 7th July 1857 for his heroism during the Battle of Jhelum, India.

After the mutiny, it formed part of the Bengal Army (the largest of the three Presidency Armies in British India), and it was renamed L Battery Royal Horse Artillery in 1889.

The battery is currently equipped with light armoured vehicles and is 1st Regiment, Royal Horse Artillery's Tactical Group Battery.