Pages

Sunday, 8 June 2025

Watching YouTube

When I was confined to my bed for several months last year, I became an avid watcher of YouTube ... and I thought that I would share a list of some of the channels I subscribe to with my regular blog readers.

History of Wargaming Project: As a longtime supporter of John Curry's project to publish as many of the 'lost' wargame books as possible and publishing new works about Matrix Games, Cyber warfare, and professional wargaming, it would have been very remiss of me not to subscribe to this channel!

Miniature Adventure: As Big Lee's states on his channel introduction, his videos 'are designed for the busy wargamer who enjoys long-form videos but doesn't always have the time to watch them. So if you want short, interesting battle reports, hobby conversations, rules reviews and show reports, this channel is for you.' They certainly are as described, and I thoroughly recommend that all wargamers should subscribe to his channel!

Phil Sabin: Phil's occasional series of videos include battle reports and explanations of his rules.

Big Wargames: Ken Hanning's channel covers the Rapid Fire wargames he stages in his superb  purpose-build wargame room in Perthshire, Scotland.

Doug C: Doug describes his channel as a 'channel for vintage, Gilderesque wargaming 'In the Grand Manner''. In particular, it is the only place on the internet where I have found videos of the episodes of BATTLEGROUND, the Tyne Tees TV series about wargaming that was hosted by Edward Woodward. These include the battles of Chalons, Edgehill, Waterloo, and Gettysburg.

Budget Model Railways: My 'go to' model railway YouTube channel! Lots of ideas and inspiration, with regular updates.

Michael Chartres: I have only recently discovered this channel, but I find listening to and watching Michael renovate his 00-gauge model railway both interesting and inspiring. Like me, he is no spring chicken, but some of the methods he has used certainly made me sit up and say to myself 'why didn't I think of that!'

Jago Hazzard: Jago specialises in railways-related topics, especially those operated by TfL (Transport for London). He also has several model railway videos on his channel ... and they are well worth watching.

Sam's Trains: Sam's regular reviews of model railway locomotives and rolling stock are a must for anyone with an interest in the hobby.

WW2 Pod: We have ways of Making You Talk: This is Al Murray and James Holland's official YouTube channel about the Second World War. The banter between these two is fun, informative, and thought-provoking. What's not to like?

Lets Tab 59: This channel's owner is an ex-British Army NCO and besides doing lots of 'tabs' (Tactical Advance into Battle ... or countryside walks, during which he talks about all sorts of military topics), he also raises money for charity.

Shrewsbury House: This is a very new channel, but I subscribe because it is our local community centre and its where I go for my weekly gaming session with Dice on the Hill.

Friday, 6 June 2025

The Budget Model Railways Challenge: Inspiration for my choice of layout

As regular blog readers will know, I've always hankered after having some sort of indoor equivalent of John Ruddle's garden wargames setup.

John's setup included a garden railway, and it was looking at several of the photographs that included railway track that inspired me to think about modelling a border fortress that is served by a spur from a major railway line.

The only problem was that I didn't have a model fortress to use on my layout ... and then I remembered that back in 2023 I bought a plywood model castle from the English heritage shop at Deal Castle. Luckily, I had not put it into storage and after a quick search of my toy/wargame room, I found it.

The pieces just push together, and when fully assembled, it looks like this:

I assembled mine ... and realised that it was far too large for the layout BUT that its parts could be adapted so that I could build a small fortress and have plenty of parts over that I could use to build other buildings. For example, the two towers could be used as the basis of a church or cathedral.

My next task is to build my small border fortress ... and I hope to do that over the next week.

Thursday, 5 June 2025

Henry Hyde's Battlechat 117 with Professor Gary Sheffield

In his latest podcast on his BATTLECHAT channel, Henry Hyde interviews Professor Gary Sheffield ... who happens to be both an old friend of mine and my occasional online wargaming opponent.

On his website, Henry describes their discussion as follows:

Battlechat 117 with Professor Gary Sheffield ... in which we discuss all things warfighting, and our thoughts about how some aspects of our discussion can be incorporated into our wargames.

Well, what a discussion! This is a real meant-and-potatoes chat about some of the nitty-gritty aspects of warfare, deep diving into some of the visceral aspects of battle, such as SLA Marshall's theories about how many men actually used their weapons and the brutal realities of bayonet fighting. Gary also has a lot to say about the concept of 'Big Men', those individuals who, in a critical moment of battle, can suddenly make all the difference between success and failure.

We also look into some of the psychology around training, battle and loss of key men, and jut what it takes to turn well-mannered civilians into soldiers capable of killing not just at a distance with firearms or artillery, but also quite literally at 'the sharp end'.

In all of this, Gary (who last appeared on the show in Episode 99) references the very latest research he is doing for his next book, and it's a real insight into the kind of background reading that an academic military historian needs to do in creating a piece of work that brings something new to the academic table, sometimes overturning old theories with new evidence, and sometimes being inspired by the latest trends in military history, all of which seem to be paying much more attention to modern work around psychology and sociology as well as classic references about strategy and tactics.

I hope you enjoy this chat – one of the longest battlechats of recent times – as much as I did, and find something of value and thought-provoking enough to make you reconsider some aspects of your own games.

I was able to listen to this discussion before it was released to the general public (I am one of Henry's Patreon supporters), and it was one of the best podcasts that I have heard in a long time.

Tuesday, 3 June 2025

Nugget 372

I will be collecting the latest issue of THE NUGGET from the printer (Macaulay Scott Printing Company of Welling, Kent) later this morning, and I will posted it out to members as soon as I can.

I will also send the PDF copy to the webmaster as soon as I can so that members can read this issue of THE NUGGET online.


IMPORTANT: Please note that this is the ninth issue of THE NUGGET to be published for the 2024-2025 subscription year.

If you wish to subscribe for the 2024-2025 subscription year and have not yet done so, please request a PayPal invoice or the bank transfer information from the Treasurer or follow the instructions on the relevant page of the website.

Monday, 2 June 2025

The Budget Model Railways Challenge: A progress report

The first thing that I did was to paint the top of the floating shelf with three coats of Ochre Yellow acrylic paint.

I then placed my railway track onto the floating shelf to ensure that it fitted.

I then marked the places on the floating shelf where I would need to drill holes for the power supply and points wires …

… and then fixed the track to the floating shelf using a combination of white glue and track pins, ensuring that the wires passed through the holes I had drilled.

I then tested that the layout … and discovered that the points wouldn’t work! Despite checking everything I could, it proved impossible to track down the fault and I had to carefully remove the track.

I soon discovered the problem; the spring inside the points had come loose, and despite taking the points apart, it proved impossible for me to repair. As I didn’t have a like-for-like replacement, I had to re-think my layout plan.

In the end, I used a set of smaller radius manual points and adjusted the track accordingly. Once this was pinned and glued to the floating shelf, I tested it …

… and although it worked, I discovered that my 0-6-0 locomotives coped with the points and tighter curve better that my small 0-4-0 and large 0-6-2 locomotives.

I then painted the front edge and both ends of the floating shelf with matt black acrylic paint as I think that this frames the layout.

The next stage in this project is to decide on the theme for the layout.

Saturday, 31 May 2025

The 109th anniversary of the Battle of Jutland … and some wonderful wargaming memories

Today marks the 109th anniversary of the initial stages of the biggest naval battle of the Great War, the Battle of Jutland.

Map showing the course of the Battle of Jutland.

Over the years, many naval wargamers have re-fought this crucial battles, and I took part in two such wargames. The first – which was staged the the US Naval War College in the Queen’s House at the National Maritime Museum in Greenwich – was in November 2018, and the second staged by the Jockey’s Fields Irregulars in Holborn, London in December 2021.

The former used rules written by the staff of the US Naval War College in 1922 in light of the experience gained and data gathered during the Great War, ...

An example of the individual ship record cards used in the US Naval War College's 1922 Naval War Game.

... and the latter used a simplified, fast-play version of Fletcher Pratt's Naval War Game. Both used 1:1200th-scale model ships ... and the sight of so many model ships was stunning!

The final positions of the British and German fleets at the end of the Jockey's Fields re-fight of the Battle of Jutland..

Now that I can no longer crawl about on the floor, I doubt if I’ll ever be able to take part in such large naval wargames in the future … but I have some wonderful memories of those two wargames!

Friday, 30 May 2025

The guns of the Imperial Brazilian Ironclads

The Imperial Brazilian ironclads were armed with the following guns:

  • 120-pounder Whitworth rifled muzzle-loading cannon
  • 70-pounder Whitworth rifled muzzle-loading cannon
  • 68-pounder smoothbore muzzle-loading cannon
  • 12-pounder smoothbore muzzle-loading cannon


120-pounder Whitworth rifled muzzle-loading cannon

This was a rifled muzzle-loader that had a Whitworth hexagonal rifled bore.

A drawing of Joseph Whitworth's hexagonal polygonal gun bore and projectile. It was used in weapons ranging from infantry rifles up to 120-pounder cannons.

  • Weight: 16,660 pounds (7,556.8 kg)
  • Length 144 inches (3.658 m)
  • Projectiles: Shell; Solid shot; Explosive shell
  • Shell weight: 151 pounds (68.5 kg)
  • Calibre: 7-inch (178 mm)
  • Maximum range: 5,540 yards (5,070 m)

Research indicates that the Imperial Brazilian Navy was the only purchaser of this cannon.


70-pounder Whitworth rifled muzzle-loading cannon

This was a rifled muzzle-loader that had a Whitworth hexagonal rifled bore.

  • Weight: 8,582 pounds (3,892.7 kg)
  • Length 118 inches (2,997 m)
  • Projectiles: Shell; Solid shot; Explosive shell
  • Shell weight: 81 pounds (36.7 kg)
  • Calibre: 5.5-inch (140 mm)
  • Maximum range: 5,540 yards (5,070 m)

Four of these cannons were seized by the United States Navy on 29th January 1863 when the blockade-runner Princess Royal was captured by the USS Unadilla and the USS G W Blunt.


68-pounder smoothbore muzzle-loading cannon

A 68-pounder smoothbore muzzle-loading cannon. This example used to be on display outside the former Royal Artillery Museum at the Rotunda, Woolwich.

  • Weight: 88 cwt/9,856 pounds (4,470.606 kg), 95 cwt/10,640 pounds (4,826.223 kg), 112 cwt/12,544 pounds (5698.863 kg)
  • Length: 88 cwt: 9 feet 6 inches (2,896 mm); 95 cwt: 10 feet (3,048 mm); 112 cwt: 10 feet 10 inches (3,302 mm)
  • Projectiles: Solid shot; Explosive shell
  • Shell weight: 68 pounds (30.84 kg)
  • Calibre: 8.12 inches (20.62 cm)
  • Maximum range: 3,620 yards (3,310 m)


12-pounder smoothbore muzzle-loading cannon

By 1860, the 12-pounder smoothbore muzzle-loading cannon was obsolete.

  • Weight: 32 cwt/1,626 pounds (736.541 kg)
  • Length: 9 feet (274 mm)
  • Projectiles: Solid shot; Explosive shell
  • Shell weight: 9 pounds (4.1 kg)
  • Calibre: 4.623 inches inches (11.74 cm)
  • Maximum range: 1,800 yards (1,610 m)

Thursday, 29 May 2025

Narrow Gauge Adventure: The story of The Craig & Mertonford Railway

Thanks to Kev Robertson's recent blog post about NARROW GAUGE ADVENTURE: THE STORY OF THE CRAIG & MERTONFORD RAILWAY by P D Hancock reminded me that I had read this book when it was first published, and that it – and his articles in model railway magazines – was the reason why I became enamoured of narrow gauge model railways.

As a result, I did a search on the internet and found a second-hand copy of the book on sale at a reasonable price ... and bought it! It was delivered last Saturday and I have spend several hours engrossed in reading it ... and getting lots of ideas for my future layouts!

The book is split into eleven chapters and three appendices:

  • 1. The idea is born
  • 2. An historical digression
  • 3. The early years
  • 4. The year of the trams
  • 5. The middle years
  • 6. Putting back the clock
  • 7. The second Craigshire
  • 8. I like locomotives
  • 9. The narrow-gauge locomotives
  • 10. The standard-gauge locomotives
  • 11. The Craigshire landscape
  • Appendix 1: Operating timetable
  • Appendix 2: Rolling Stock
  • Appendix 3: Things that might have been

The book contains lots of inspiring monochrome photographs and drawings, including several maps that show the various stages of the development of the layout and some intriguing ones that show what the layout might have looked out had circumstance been different.


NARROW GAUGE ADVENTURE: THE STORY OF THE CRAIG & MERTONFORD RAILWAY was written by P D Hancock and published in 1975 by Peco Publications and Publicity Ltd (SBN 900586 44 4).

Wednesday, 28 May 2025

Nugget 372

The editor of THE NUGGET sent me the latest issue on Sunday evening, and I sent it to the printer (Macauley Scott Printing Company, Welling, Kent) on Tuesday morning. I hope to be able to collect it later this week and post it out to members of Wargame Developments by next weekend.


IMPORTANT: Please note that this is the ninth issue of THE NUGGET to be published for the 2024-2025 subscription year.

If you wish to subscribe for the 2024-2025 subscription year and have not yet done so, please request a PayPal invoice or the bank transfer information from the Treasurer or follow the instructions on the relevant page of the website.

Tuesday, 27 May 2025

The sinking of the Bismarck

On 27th May 1941, the German battleship Bismarck was sunk by units of the Royal Navy.

Bismarck.
Prinz Eugen.

She had left Germany in the company of the heavy cruiser Prinz Eugen on 19th May, and after sailing through the Kattegat (where she was spotted by the Swedish cruiser HSwMS Gotland) and reached Norwegian waters on the following evening. By midday on 21st May, Bismarck and Prinz Eugen and a small flotilla of destroyers reached Bergen and anchored in Grimstadfjord.

HSwMS Gotland.

At 7.30pm on 21st May, Bismarck, Prinz Eugen, and the three escorting destroyers left Bergen, The destroyers part company with the battleship and the cruiser at not long after 4.00am on 22st May, and at midday the Bismarck and the Prinz Eugen turned towards the Denmark Strait and thence into the North Atlantic.

By this time the British Home Fleet were aware that the two German ships had left Norway and units had begun to deploy to intercept them.

At 7.22pm on 23rd May, the German warships detected the cruiser HMS Suffolk at a range of approximately 12,500 m (13,700 yd). HMS Suffolk was joined by HMS Norfolk at 8.30pm, and the pair of cruisers shadowed the German ships using their radar equipment.

HMS Suffolk.
HMS Norfolk.

At 05.45am on 24th May, the Germans spotted the smoke of the fast aproching HMS Hood and HMS Prince of Wales on the horizon, and at 5.52am HMS Hood opened fire on Prinz Eugen. HMS Prince of Wales opened fire a minute or so later, and by soon afterwards the two German ships began to return fire.

Eight minutes after opening fire, HMS Hood was hit by several heavy shells, exploded, and sank. The Bismarck switched her fire to HMS Prince of Wales and immediately hit the ship's bridge. This, coupled with a serious problems with the ship's main armament that reduced her to a broadside of five rather than ten 14-inch guns, caused her captain to turn away and break off the action. She then joined the two British cruisers who continued to shadow the German warships.

After ascertaining the extent of damaged caused by the British three shells that had hit Bismarck, Admiral Lütjens, who was in command of the two German ships, ordered the Prinz Eugen to sail towards France, which she did at 6.14pm during a squall.(One shell had hit the forward part of the Bismarck causing approximately 2,000 tons of water to flood into the ship, contaminating fuel oil stored in the bow tanks and flooding in one of the boiler room).

Bismarck then turned towards the shadowing British ships, and HMS Prince of Wales fired twelve salvos at the Bismarck, which returned fire. Neither side scored any hits. The Bismarck then resumed her previous course and the three British ships continued to shadow her from a distance.

At 10:00pm, the recently commissioned HMS Victorious launched an attack on the Bismarck by nine Fairey Swordfish torpedo bombers. Of the eight torpedoes they launched, only one hit the Bismarck, and it caused minor damage amidships. However, the violent manoeuvres Bismarck undertook to avoid the torpedoes increased the flooding in the forward part of the ship and resulted in the loss of a second boiler room. This caused Bismarck to reduce speed to 16 knots until repairs could be completed. She was then able to increase speed to 20 knots.

HMS Victorius.

Admiral Lütjens now decided that Bismarck should set course for France. At 03.00am on 25th May Lütjens ordered an increase in speed and for Bismarck to turn to the west and then northwards. As a result of the manoeuvre, Bismarck caused the shadowing British ships to lose contact.

The German admiral then sent a long radio signal to Naval Group West headquarters in Paris. This enabled the British signal interception service to take bearings that provided an up-to-date position of the German battleship. Unfortunately, this was misplotted on HMS King George V (which was leading the search for the Bismarck) and it was not until an RAF Consolidated Catalina flying boat spotted her at 10.30am on 26th May that the Bismarck's accurate position and course were known to her pursuers.

HMS Ark Royal.
HMS Sheffield.

HMS Ark Royal, which was part of Force H, mounted an torpedo bomber attack on Bismarck. The Fairey Swordfish aircraft mistakenly attacked HMS Sheffield ... and discovered that the magnetic detonators fitted to their torpedoes were faulty. The aircraft returned to HMS Ark Royal, rearmed with torpedoes fitted with conventional contact detonators and made a second attack on the German battleship. At 8.47pm, the Swordfish began their attack, and despite undertaking violent manoeuvres and firing at the aircraft with every available gun, two torpedoes hit the Bismarck.

One torpedoe hit her amidships on the port side, just under the main armour belt. This caused minor damage and some flooding. The second torpedo also hit Bismarck on the port side near the stern and close to the port rudder shaft. More importantly, the port rudder assembly was badly damaged by this torpedo hit and jammed the rudder at an angle of 12° to port. This caused her to steer in a very large circle.

The Bismarck was now unable to escape her pursuers. HMS Sheffield, which was now in visual range of the Bismarck, was driven off by several salvoes of 15-inch shells. Her shadowing role was now taken on by five destroyers that were under the command of Captain Philip Vian. They intercepted the German battleship at 10.38pm on 26th May.

During the night of 26th/27th May, the destroyers mounted several torpedo attacks on the Bismarck, none of which were successful. Just after daybreak on 27th May, HMS King George V and HMS Rodney came in to view and at 8.47am the latter opened fire on the Bismarck at a range of approximately 25,000 yards (23,000 m).

HMS Rodney.
HMS King George V.

Moments later, HMS King George V also opened fire, and at 8.50am the Bismarck began firing at HMS Rodney. As the range reduced, the British heavy cruisers HMS Norfolk and HMS Dorsetshire began firing salvoes of 5-inch shells at the Bismarck and at 09.02am, one of HMS Rodney's 16-inch shells hit the Bismarck's forward superstructure, killing hundreds of men (probably including Admiral Lütjens and Bismarck's captain, Captain Lindemann) and seriously damaging the battleship's two forward turrets (Anton and Bruno).

Bismarck's forward turrets ceased firing at 9.27am, and by 9.31am her rear turrets (Caesar and Dora) were also no longer firing. At 9.30am, the Bismarck's executive officer Fregattenkapitän Hans Oels ordered:

  • Any crew remaining below decks to abandon ship.
  • The opening of the ship's watertight doors to enable crew to escape quickly and to assist in the scuttling of the ship.
  • The preparation of the ship's scuttling charges.

At around 10.20am the ship's chief engineering officer (Gerhard Junack) set of the scuttling charges, by which time the British battleships were firing at the helpless Bismarck at a range of approximately 3,000 yards (2,700 m). At the same time, HMS Dorsetshire was ordered to close in and torpedo Bismarck. She fired three, two on the target's port side and one on the starboard side ... and by 10.40am Bismarck had sunk.

HMS Dorsetshire.

Only 114 of Bismarck's crew of over 2,200 men survived.